Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: time |
| Date | 2012-11-21 11:11 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <ah4g9nFiu5U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <k8ehrs$ddf$1@dont-email.me> <pan.2012.11.20.03.07.29.506000@nowhere.com> <8dd71a20-5caa-4e4a-8c1f-5c7d84b56bd2@h9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> |
"Anand Hariharan" <mailto.anand.hariharan@gmail.com> wrote in message news:8dd71a20-5caa-4e4a-8c1f-5c7d84b56bd2@h9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com... On Nov 19, 9:07 pm, Nobody <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote: > > The simple solution is srand(time(NULL)). However, time() only has a one > second resolution, so consecutive invocations of the program may produce > identical results. Given an application for which, the standard rand family of functions is sufficient, why would one want to make consecutive invocations to srand? Threading messed up by google's proprietary interface. Perhaps one might want to test his program before releasing it for general use?
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-19 19:11 -0500
Re: time Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-19 16:26 -0800
Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-19 16:51 -0800
Re: time Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-19 17:01 -0800
Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-19 20:07 -0500
Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-19 23:54 -0800
Re: time pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-11-20 07:31 -0500
Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-20 17:09 -0500
Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-19 16:30 -0800
Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-19 20:04 -0500
Re: time Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-25 05:52 -0800
Re: time Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-11-20 03:07 +0000
Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-19 23:58 -0800
Re: time Anand Hariharan <mailto.anand.hariharan@gmail.com> - 2012-11-21 08:30 -0800
Re: time "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2012-11-21 11:11 -0600
Re: time James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-21 12:22 -0500
Re: time gof@somewhere.invalid (Adam Wysocki) - 2012-11-21 19:09 +0000
Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-21 12:01 -0800
Re: time gof@somewhere.invalid (Adam Wysocki) - 2012-11-23 08:15 +0000
Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-21 15:16 -0500
Re: time "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2012-11-21 14:23 -0600
Re: time Rosario1903 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-22 10:25 +0100
Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-21 12:30 -0800
Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-21 18:24 -0500
Re: time Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-25 05:56 -0800
Re: time Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-11-22 02:00 +0000
Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-21 19:57 -0800
Re: time gof@somewhere.invalid (Adam Wysocki) - 2012-11-23 08:31 +0000
Re: time army1987 <army1987@ask-for-it.invalid> - 2012-11-24 13:58 +0000
Re: time Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-22 11:36 +0000
Re: time gof@somewhere.invalid (Adam Wysocki) - 2012-11-23 08:20 +0000
Re: time Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-23 14:31 +0000
Re: time Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-25 05:54 -0800
Re: time Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2012-11-20 08:34 -0600
Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-20 20:37 -0500
Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-20 20:25 -0800
Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-21 15:11 -0500
csiph-web