Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #28535

Re: time

From gof@somewhere.invalid (Adam Wysocki)
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: time
Date 2012-11-21 19:09 +0000
Organization ATMAN - ATM S.A.
Message-ID <gof.1353524440.12609@somewhere.invalid> (permalink)
References <k8ehrs$ddf$1@dont-email.me> <pan.2012.11.20.03.07.29.506000@nowhere.com> <8dd71a20-5caa-4e4a-8c1f-5c7d84b56bd2@h9g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <50AD0DC6.5090505@verizon.net>

Show all headers | View raw

James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> wrote:

> If srand(time(NULL)) were used in that program, it would generate 
> the same exact sequence of random numbers for all requests received 
> during the same second.

Maybe adding process ID to the seed calculation would do the job.

Instead of:

srand(time(NULL))

Use:

srand(time(NULL) ^ getpid())

Or even:

srand(time(NULL) ^ (getpid() << 16))

AW

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-19 19:11 -0500
  Re: time Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-19 16:26 -0800
    Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-19 16:51 -0800
      Re: time Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-19 17:01 -0800
      Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-19 20:07 -0500
        Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-19 23:54 -0800
          Re: time pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-11-20 07:31 -0500
          Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-20 17:09 -0500
  Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-19 16:30 -0800
    Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-19 20:04 -0500
      Re: time Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-25 05:52 -0800
  Re: time Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-11-20 03:07 +0000
    Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-19 23:58 -0800
    Re: time Anand Hariharan <mailto.anand.hariharan@gmail.com> - 2012-11-21 08:30 -0800
      Re: time "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2012-11-21 11:11 -0600
      Re: time James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-11-21 12:22 -0500
        Re: time gof@somewhere.invalid (Adam Wysocki) - 2012-11-21 19:09 +0000
          Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-21 12:01 -0800
            Re: time gof@somewhere.invalid (Adam Wysocki) - 2012-11-23 08:15 +0000
          Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-21 15:16 -0500
            Re: time "osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2012-11-21 14:23 -0600
              Re: time Rosario1903 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2012-11-22 10:25 +0100
            Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-21 12:30 -0800
              Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-21 18:24 -0500
            Re: time Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-25 05:56 -0800
          Re: time Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2012-11-22 02:00 +0000
            Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-21 19:57 -0800
              Re: time gof@somewhere.invalid (Adam Wysocki) - 2012-11-23 08:31 +0000
            Re: time army1987 <army1987@ask-for-it.invalid> - 2012-11-24 13:58 +0000
          Re: time Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-22 11:36 +0000
            Re: time gof@somewhere.invalid (Adam Wysocki) - 2012-11-23 08:20 +0000
              Re: time Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-11-23 14:31 +0000
      Re: time Nick Keighley <nick_keighley_nospam@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-25 05:54 -0800
  Re: time Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2012-11-20 08:34 -0600
    Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-20 20:37 -0500
      Re: time Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-11-20 20:25 -0800
        Re: time "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2012-11-21 15:11 -0500

csiph-web