Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.sinclair > #953

Re: p file spec wanted

From Patrick Schaefer <pa.schaefer@web.de>
Newsgroups comp.sys.sinclair
Subject Re: p file spec wanted
Date 2012-04-29 23:21 +0200
Message-ID <a05pn9Fe83U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (3 earlier) <4f96bc56$0$1685$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <4F96EDF2.MD-1.4.17.chris.young@unsatisfactorysoftware.co.uk> <4f9b02c3$1$20184$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <a00gtvFcgjU1@mid.individual.net> <4f9d3cc1$0$6458$426a74cc@news.free.fr>

Show all headers | View raw

Am 29.04.2012 15:06 schrieb GzavSnap:

> > How do I have to set NXTLIN to get rid of the autostart? To DFILE-1?
> The NXTLIN is used in the Basic Monitor (ROM) and is set to the Next
> Basic address line.
> This pointer is a 16bits value.
> You had to retrive the right address line in the Basic chained lines.
> Not easy to retrive the Basic line offset in the memory, but try to launch
> your "p" file on the first line ! (the first REM... like a Run command)

This is the value where it is set now. Therefore the program is executed 
immediately after loading. Now I would like to patch the .p file to 
prevent this autostart, so that I can save my file to RAMdisk before it 
is run the first time.


> You had to retrive the right address line in the Basic chained lines.

Which line is addressed when the progam is NOT running? Do I have to set 
it after the last line (i.e. start of the variable area resp. DFILE-1 
when no vars are present), or is there a special value for "number 
invalid -- we are in edit mode"?


Patrick

Back to comp.sys.sinclair | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

p file spec wanted Patrick Schaefer <pa.schaefer@web.de> - 2012-04-23 22:02 +0200
  Re: p file spec wanted "Paul E Collins" <equi+web@cl4.invalid> - 2012-04-24 11:51 +0100
    Re: p file spec wanted "GzavSnap" <zx81.pas.de.spam.ordi5.chez.free.en.france> - 2012-04-24 16:43 +0200
      Re: p file spec wanted "GzavSnap" <zx81.pas.de.spam.ordi5.chez.free.en.france> - 2012-04-24 16:44 +0200
        Re: p file spec wanted "Chris Young" <chris.usenet@mail-filter.com> - 2012-04-24 18:16 +0100
          Re: p file spec wanted "GzavSnap" <zx81.pas.de.spam.ordi5.chez.free.en.france> - 2012-04-27 22:13 +0200
            Re: p file spec wanted Patrick Schaefer <pa.schaefer@web.de> - 2012-04-27 23:20 +0200
              Re: p file spec wanted "GzavSnap" <zx81.pas.de.spam.ordi5.chez.free.en.france> - 2012-04-29 15:06 +0200
                Re: p file spec wanted "GzavSnap" <zx81.pas.de.spam.ordi5.chez.free.en.france> - 2012-04-29 15:16 +0200
                Re: p file spec wanted Patrick Schaefer <pa.schaefer@web.de> - 2012-04-29 23:21 +0200
                Re: p file spec wanted "GzavSnap" <zx81.pas.de.spam.ordi5.chez.free.en.france> - 2012-04-30 20:59 +0200
                Re: p file spec wanted Patrick Schaefer <pa.schaefer@web.de> - 2012-04-30 22:57 +0200
              Re: p file spec wanted Patrick Schaefer <pa.schaefer@web.de> - 2012-05-01 13:43 +0200
        OT: Re: p file spec wanted Peter Liebert-Adelt <peter@zschopower.de> - 2012-04-25 11:31 +0200
          Re: Re: p file spec wanted "GzavSnap" <zx81.pas.de.spam.ordi5.chez.free.en.france> - 2012-04-27 22:03 +0200
    Re: p file spec wanted Patrick Schaefer <pa.schaefer@web.de> - 2012-04-24 20:17 +0200
      Re: p file spec wanted Peter Liebert-Adelt <peter@zschopower.de> - 2012-04-25 11:34 +0200

csiph-web