Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #15682
| From | Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.thunderbird |
| Subject | Re: Freeze extension? |
| Date | 2025-01-18 16:48 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <XnsB26BAAEF89F80nilch1@wheedledeedle.moc> (permalink) |
| References | <XnsB26B8D262171Cnilch1@wheedledeedle.moc> <vmgtrm$11q6b$1@dont-email.me> |
On 18 Jan 2025, Bill H <billh@domain.is.invalid> wrote in alt.comp.software.thunderbird: > On Saturday, January 18, 2025, at 10:52 AM, Nil wrote: > >> Is there a way to prevent one particular extension from offering >> to update? One of mine, Cardbook, is buggy in its latest version >> with the latest versions of Thunderbird. I'd like to keep >> Cardbook at an old version until the developer fixes it. I can, >> of course, manually decline the update, but that's one more thing >> to remember. > > I have automatic update turned off for all my extensions so that > they only update when I manually update. That way I just don't > update any updates that I'm not sure I want. > > How is Cardbook buggy for you? It seems to be fine here with the > latest updates of both Cardbook and TB. I have Tbird extensions set for manual updates, too, but I'd prefer any updates to Cardbook not even be shown to me at this time. Some of my computers are still using Thunderbird 115.18.0 and Cardbook 94.5, which is the latest version offered for that Tbird. This combination works fine. A couple other computers are using Tbird 128.6.0esr, and a newer version of Cardbook, 97.7, is offered for this newer version of Tbird. If I stick to old version 94.5, it looks and acts like I expect. If I update Cardbook to 97.7, the display is garbled - font is wrong, elements are displaced, pictures missing, scrollbars are missing or non-working. I can downgrade to 94.5 and all is again well. Reading about the issues on Github, this appears to be a common and known problem that was introduced during CB 95.x and has something to do with the developer converting the interface to html. Seems it still needs work. I'm surprised that it looks OK to you - this is the kind of thing that I would have guessed affected everybody or nobody, but apparently not.
Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-18 13:52 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? Bill H <billh@domain.is.invalid> - 2025-01-18 11:02 -0800
Re: Freeze extension? Bill H <billh@domain.is.invalid> - 2025-01-18 11:19 -0800
Re: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-18 16:48 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? BillH <billh@domain.is.invalid> - 2025-01-18 14:01 -0800
Re: Freeze extension? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-01-18 18:13 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? Bill H <billh@domain.is.invalid> - 2025-01-18 15:16 -0800
Re: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-18 20:50 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-18 20:54 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-18 21:10 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? Bill H <billh@domain.is.invalid> - 2025-01-18 19:16 -0800
Re: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-19 02:28 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? Bill H <billh@domain.is.invalid> - 2025-01-19 08:47 -0800
Re: Freeze extension? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-01-19 12:49 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-19 13:13 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-01-19 14:59 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-19 16:15 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-01-19 16:29 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-19 16:51 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-01-19 17:20 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-19 17:56 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? "Alan K." <alan@invalid.com> - 2025-01-19 18:11 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? David <David@example.net> - 2025-01-20 08:05 +0000
Re: Freeze extension? Bill H <billh@domain.is.invalid> - 2025-01-19 14:11 -0800
Re: Freeze extension? Bill H <billh@domain.is.invalid> - 2025-01-19 13:09 -0800
Re: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-19 16:23 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? "BillH" <billh@domain.is.invalid> - 2025-01-19 22:31 +0000
RE: Freeze extension? Wilf <wilf21@is.invalid> - 2025-01-20 09:43 +0000
Re: Freeze extension? Bill H <billh@domain.is.invalid> - 2025-01-20 08:28 -0800
Re: Freeze extension? Bill H <billh@domain.is.invalid> - 2025-01-19 10:57 -0800
Re: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-19 13:15 -0500
Re: Freeze extension? Bill H <billh@domain.is.invalid> - 2025-01-19 10:58 -0800
Re: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-22 13:30 -0500
RE: Freeze extension? Wilf <wilf21@is.invalid> - 2025-01-19 13:36 +0000
RE: Freeze extension? Nil <rednoise9@rednoise9.invalid> - 2025-01-19 14:37 -0500
csiph-web