Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #77664

Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?

From Diesel <me@privacy.net>
Newsgroups alt.comp.os.windows-10, microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, comp.mobile.android, alt.comp.freeware
Subject Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?
Date 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <XnsA98E2B6894BCDHT1@YMHc9WdP.R3Ec> (permalink)
References (10 earlier) <pqkpir.d3k.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <pqknnv$1os1$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pql804.5o.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <pql99m$puv$1@gioia.aioe.org> <pqn342$4lg$1@news.mixmin.net>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net>
news:pqn342$4lg$1@news.mixmin.net Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:10:43 GMT in
comp.mobile.android, wrote: 

> If I'm not clear Rudy, let me know.
> 
> BTW, to add value, it came up in the a.c.f thread the following,
> which others may benefit from, particularly those, like Rudy, on
> older versions of Windows - which is very useful technical
> information for those of you on older Windows who still wish to do
> what we've done here to mount Android file systems onto Windows in
> order to run Windows commands directly on them:

I see you didn't credit me for telling you about this... Yet, you 
felt free to quote directly from me, verbatim. Nice of you. So, about 
that apology for having called me a moron, previously? Since when do 
you quote morons and proceed to claim what they (not you) wrote is 
useful technical information? <BIG FUCKING GRIN>
 
>    "Win2k and down net use does NOT support WebDAV on their own. 
>     You have to use 3rd party utilities if you want to map a drive
>     via webDAV in those cases."

Ayep. Would you like the MID of MY message that you quoted this from? 
*I* was the one who told you about this, not pooh, not frank, not 
anybody else. *I* did. Pooh for example misinformed you by telling 
you that net use only supported samba. Windows XP has been around for 
a very long fucking time and has supported webdav natively via built 
in client since it's release...nearly two decades ago. There's no 
valid reason for a 'tech' or 'network' wizard, engineer, etc, not to 
know that. Unless, they've been BULLSHITTING about their expertise 
the entire time.

Here's what you initially wrote about it though, until a couple of 
others on the thread jumped in to explain how off you were...

Message-ID: <pqnsii$fav$1@news.mixmin.net>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154114027600

From:  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware
Subject: Re: Does freeware exist on Windows that will mount (as a 
drive letter) Android connected via USB as MTP?
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:25:07 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Mixmin
Message-ID: <pqnsii$fav$1@news.mixmin.net>

Is it just me, or are these two verbatim quotes about "net use" 
WebDav support in this thread, both from the same person, completely
contradictory?

Verbatim quote 1:
   "Win2k and down net use does NOT support WebDAV on their own. 
   You have to use 3rd party utilities if you want to map a drive 
   via webDAV in those cases."

Verbatim quote 2:
  "Starting with Windows XP, net use does support WebDAV, natively. 
   Do you remember one of the touted new features of XP? 
   The so called 'web folders'? Well, that's how it works."

Am I the only one having trouble comprehending Diesel's posts?

*** end paste


> Since Rudy is on WinXP (I believe), then maybe _he_ can act like
> an adult to figure out what those 3rd-party utilities might be.
> That would be an adult thing to do - which would be to _add
> value_. 
> But it would take an adult to actually add technical value to this
> thread. 

Indeed, You quoted a piece of my post and credited it for it's 
technical value. Any particular reason you didn't credit me as the 
author? It's easy enough to verify I wrote it. Is this an example of 
your superior adult attitude vs my own, Arlen? It seems rather 
childish to quote me, admit the technical value and not credit me for 
the information you acquired, at no cost.

I've learned in the brief (thankfully) period of time I've interacted 
with you though that you aren't what you claim to be and don't do the 
things you claim you'll do. You're intentionally dishonest, shifty, 
and rather obnoxious with your grade school level insults. It would 
be much more amusing if it wasn't the upper limit of your abilities. 
That I find to be somewhat, saddening.

Case in point:

Message-ID: <pqnsii$fav$1@news.mixmin.net>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154114027600

From:  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware
Subject: Re: Does freeware exist on Windows that will mount (as a 
drive letter) Android connected via USB as MTP?
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:25:07 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Mixmin
Message-ID: <pqnsii$fav$1@news.mixmin.net>

Is it just me, or are these two verbatim quotes about "net use" 
WebDav support in this thread, both from the same person, completely
contradictory?

Verbatim quote 1:
   "Win2k and down net use does NOT support WebDAV on their own. 
   You have to use 3rd party utilities if you want to map a drive 
   via webDAV in those cases."

Verbatim quote 2:
  "Starting with Windows XP, net use does support WebDAV, natively. 
   Do you remember one of the touted new features of XP? 
   The so called 'web folders'? Well, that's how it works."

Am I the only one having trouble comprehending Diesel's posts?

*** end paste


-- 
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
===================================================
If God hadn't wanted me to be paranoid, He wouldn't have given me 
such a vivid imagination.

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-14 17:24 +0000
  Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2018-10-17 01:06 +0100
    Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-18 16:26 +0000
      Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-18 18:13 +0000
        Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-18 19:59 +0000
          Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-18 20:42 +0000
            Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-18 21:55 +0000
          Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? M.L. <me@privacy.invalid> - 2018-10-19 23:04 -0500
            Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2018-10-20 00:37 -0400
              Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-21 19:20 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2018-10-21 16:42 -0400
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-21 22:47 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-22 13:51 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2018-10-22 16:44 +0200
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-22 17:21 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2018-10-22 21:43 +0200
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 20:44 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 12:10 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-23 16:16 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 19:21 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-23 20:51 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-23 16:54 -0400
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:23 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:23 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-23 23:09 +0200
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:23 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-24 02:47 +0200
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-24 10:35 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-24 17:25 +0200
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-24 15:50 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-27 07:32 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 20:37 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-23 15:58 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 19:46 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 19:52 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 22:55 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 00:37 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-23 12:55 +0200
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 12:10 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 14:11 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:36 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 19:15 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 21:44 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 21:07 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-11-02 19:05 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-03 02:00 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-11-03 15:09 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 03:37 +0000

csiph-web