Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #77000
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.os.windows-10, microsoft.public.windowsxp.general, comp.mobile.android |
| Subject | Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? |
| Date | 2018-10-22 17:21 +0000 |
| Organization | NOYB |
| Message-ID | <pql804.5o.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <pqijiq$4pg$1@news.mixmin.net> <pqiobd$1sm$1@dont-email.me> <pqivmu$mti$1@news.mixmin.net> <pqkpir.d3k.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> <pqknnv$1os1$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
R.Wieser <address@not.available> wrote: > Frank, > > >> 1. 'Map network drive' and 'net use' can not handle FTP syntax, period. > > > > If someone thinks differently, then please show *real* *working* > > examples with *real* FTP servers and port numbers, i.e. something like: > > I'm surprised that you even considered testing it. FTP is not, and has > never been, a way to access a drive. I can assure you that I know full well what FTP can and cannot do (I've - professionally - been doing networking since the very early 70s, before any kind of 'Internet'), but read on. > In the same way "net" (use) has never been something to support internet > protocols. Well, as 'Arlen' posted, 'net use' *does* work with a WebDAV server and - in this context - WebDAV does offer similar functionality as FTP. So for WebDAV, 'net use' *is* "a way to access a drive" and hence *is* "something to support internet protocols". The whole point is that 'net use' *does* offer WebDAV compatibility/ functionality, but for some reason does *not* offer FTP compatibility/ functionality. That might make sense to Microsoft, but it doesn't make any sense to normal people, especially since FTP is older than WebDAV. > Also, FTP is a *file transfer* (as in: the whole thing) protocol, not ment > to be used to do random reads and writes to a file. DIR ? Yes. COPY ? > yes. DEL ? yes. ATTRIB ? Nope, only Linux-style permissions are > supported. Anything else ? Not so much. As such it cannot even be used > to do Arlens "every window command" with it. Yes, that's the whole point! That's why he - and everybody else - *wants* a SMB solution, but - unless rooted - Android can not use ports below 1024 and Windows is too stupid to use another port (than the default 445), which most other SMB clients/servers *can*. So he/everybody else *wants* a SMB solution, but *until* that actually *works* - for a SMB server on a non-rooted Android device -, he's looking at less-ideal alternatives. > And that is where his story ends. > > Unless he's willing to check out stuff like this here: > > https://www.ferrobackup.com/map-ftp-as-disk.html > > ... Which he isn't (which is a good, but limiting choice). I can't blame you for not following all he posts, but he *did* and *does* look into this (FTPUSE) [1], but for some reason, he can not get it to work on Windows *10*. (He used it before on some other Windows version - probably Windows XP - and I used (no longer need it) it on Windows 8.1.) He has asked for others to test it on Windows 10, but AFAICT nobody has done so. I wonder why!? :-) If you have Windows 10 and want to help him, please feel free. > Than again, as long as you use third-party software (or write it yourself!) > you can get (most) everything to work - even (full, raw) disk access over > morse. :-) Nah! Morse code is SO old-fashioned. These days we use Avian Carriers [2]! [1] AFAIR, he was actually the first to mention FTPUSE in these groups. > From: Jonas Schneider <Jonas123Schneider@arcor.de> > Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general,comp.mobile.android > Subject: Re: What do you use to copy text files from Windows XP to Android over WiFi? > Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 05:41:45 +0000 (UTC) > Message-ID: <ob2bio$9m4$1@news.albasani.net> [2] <http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt>
Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-14 17:24 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2018-10-17 01:06 +0100
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-18 16:26 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-18 18:13 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-18 19:59 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-18 20:42 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-18 21:55 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? M.L. <me@privacy.invalid> - 2018-10-19 23:04 -0500
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2018-10-20 00:37 -0400
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-21 19:20 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2018-10-21 16:42 -0400
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-21 22:47 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-22 13:51 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2018-10-22 16:44 +0200
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-22 17:21 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2018-10-22 21:43 +0200
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 20:44 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 12:10 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-23 16:16 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 19:21 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-23 20:51 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-23 16:54 -0400
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:23 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:23 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-23 23:09 +0200
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:23 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-24 02:47 +0200
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-24 10:35 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-24 17:25 +0200
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-24 15:50 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-27 07:32 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 20:37 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-23 15:58 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 19:46 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 19:52 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 22:55 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 00:37 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-23 12:55 +0200
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 12:10 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 14:11 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:36 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 19:15 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 21:44 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 21:07 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-11-02 19:05 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-03 02:00 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-11-03 15:09 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Arlen Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 03:37 +0000
csiph-web