Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #77660

Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net>
news:pqna6e$hfq$4@news.mixmin.net Tue, 23 Oct 2018 14:11:27 GMT in
comp.mobile.android, wrote: 

> On Tue, 23 Oct 2018 12:10:45 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote:
> 
>> If the next technical question I post has only 1 to 3 adult
>> responses from the likes of Frank Slootweg, Paul, Andy Burns, ML,
>> and me, then we _all_ benefit since we're the only ones who added
>> any value in this thread (IMHO).
> 
> To continue the adult task of adding technical value, this snippet
> from a.c.f implies that the older WinXP _can_ handle "net use"
> mounting of WebDAV servers:
> 
>   "Starting with Windows XP, net use does support WebDAV,
>   natively. 
>    Do you remember one of the touted new features of XP? 
>    The so called 'web folders'? Well, that's how it works."
> 
> Which we can combine with this related snippet from the same
> person: 
> 
>    "Win2k and down net use does NOT support WebDAV on their own. 
>    You have to use 3rd party utilities if you want to map a drive 
>    via webDAV in those cases."

:) I appreciate you once again admitting that something I wrote (I'll 
show your new found audience that you lifted those quotes directly 
from me in a moment) does have technical value. Now, explain to me 
how I'm stupid, a moron, etc, when you've quoted my words, verbatim 
twice now in this very thread and admitted it's technical value.

And yes, I'm going to use the post that clearly shows you really do 
have reading comprehension issues as proof of where those quotes 
originated as well as your initial, FAILURE TO COMPREHEND what I 
wrote. To the point where you attempted to attack me and invited 
others to join in. [g]

As anyone who follows the thread can see though, it blew up in your 
face. You initially didn't understand what I wrote, and, attempted do 
your lack of understanding to attack me; and you quickly learned, it 
was YOU in error. Here's your post, questioning what you've now 
admitted for the second time in the same thread IS valuable technical 
information, provided by me and only by me. [g]

Message-ID: <pqnsii$fav$1@news.mixmin.net>
http://al.howardknight.net/msgid.cgi?ID=154114027600

From:  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.freeware
Subject: Re: Does freeware exist on Windows that will mount (as a 
drive letter) Android connected via USB as MTP?
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:25:07 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Mixmin
Message-ID: <pqnsii$fav$1@news.mixmin.net>

Is it just me, or are these two verbatim quotes about "net use" 
WebDav support in this thread, both from the same person, completely
contradictory?

Verbatim quote 1:
   "Win2k and down net use does NOT support WebDAV on their own. 
   You have to use 3rd party utilities if you want to map a drive 
   via webDAV in those cases."

Verbatim quote 2:
  "Starting with Windows XP, net use does support WebDAV, natively. 
   Do you remember one of the touted new features of XP? 
   The so called 'web folders'? Well, that's how it works."

Am I the only one having trouble comprehending Diesel's posts?

*** end paste

You may continue ignoring my newer posts which are asking you point 
blank, blunt, very pointed questions calling you out for the things 
you wrote that aren't true, if you'd like. It won't stop me from 
continuing to point out your mistakes, and, laugh a bit about it as I 
do. You've earned that from me, at this point, Arlen. You want to act 
like an immature child, I'll happily treat you like one.

Matter of fact, I'm going to convert your question into a tagline for 
future laughs for others benefit. Yes, it's that kind of tagline 
material. Especially when you call others, idiots, stupid, morons, 
etc.. And then you go and do something as stupid as you did in that 
post...Do you see the irony Arlen? It's staring you right in the 
face, nice n bright.

Btw, I re-inserted alt.comp.freeware; I thought some/maybe one other 
might like to see you trolling other newsgroups and lifting my 
material verbatim as you do so. It's so nice of you to again, admit 
it has technical value, after two other posters had to explain how 
the statements aren't contradictory. You realize by posting that 
question with those examples, you can no longer deny that you 
actually do, as in real life, have a reading comprehension issue.. 
Right? I mean, seriously, there's no way for you to deny it now. You 
really stepped into a pile of shit this time, Arlen. I don't think 
you're going to be able to save those shoes.

 

-- 
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit here:
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
===================================================
Q: If you have a mothball in one hand and another mothball in the 
other hand, what would you have?
A: The undivided attention of a very large moth!

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-14 17:24 +0000
  Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2018-10-17 01:06 +0100
    Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-18 16:26 +0000
      Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-18 18:13 +0000
        Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-18 19:59 +0000
          Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-18 20:42 +0000
            Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-18 21:55 +0000
          Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? M.L. <me@privacy.invalid> - 2018-10-19 23:04 -0500
            Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2018-10-20 00:37 -0400
              Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-21 19:20 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2018-10-21 16:42 -0400
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-21 22:47 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-22 13:51 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2018-10-22 16:44 +0200
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-22 17:21 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "R.Wieser" <address@not.available> - 2018-10-22 21:43 +0200
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 20:44 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 12:10 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-23 16:16 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 19:21 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-23 20:51 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2018-10-23 16:54 -0400
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:23 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:23 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-23 23:09 +0200
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:23 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-24 02:47 +0200
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-24 10:35 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-24 17:25 +0200
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-24 15:50 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-27 07:32 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 20:37 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-10-23 15:58 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 19:46 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 19:52 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 22:55 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 00:37 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? "Carlos E. R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2018-10-23 12:55 +0200
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 12:10 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 14:11 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 22:36 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 19:15 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 21:44 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-22 21:07 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-11-02 19:05 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-03 02:00 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2018-11-03 15:09 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows? Diesel <me@privacy.net> - 2018-11-02 08:03 +0000
                Re: What's the best way to forward SMB TCP port 445 to something higher than 1024 on Windows?  Arlen    Holder <a%rlenh.older@no.spam.net> - 2018-10-23 03:37 +0000

csiph-web