Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #275299

Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael runs from the same issue NIST ran from)

From "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
References (3 earlier) <mslb8j$jsi$1@pcls7.std.com> <68adnWkld-a4q3PInZ2dnUU7-VWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <mslhv1$l2i$1@pcls7.std.com> <a_OdnSaFsra7yXPInZ2dnUU7-TOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <msn3d2$pn$1@pcls7.std.com>
Subject Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael runs from the same issue NIST ran from)
Date 2015-09-08 12:39 -0500
Message-ID <V7SdnfUJsIlHgXLInZ2dnUU7-b2dnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

"Michael Moroney" <moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com> wrote in message 
news:msn3d2$pn$1@pcls7.std.com...
>
> "What happens when it [the nuclear blast wave] hits the air?"  "Nothing!"
> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!  I'm going to be laughing for days!!

Sorry dude that argument only throws out the mini-nukes theory and not the 
use of deep underground nukes that didn't have much of an atmosphere to 
start an air blast wave.

And you conveniently forgot the other side of the equation.  How does a 
"global Collapse" leave so little on the ground and then what it leaves was 
left standing?

Funny that you and NIST both run from that issue but NIST earned 10 million 
to run from that issue and I hope that makes you feel better.

Rocky

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality  "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 18:38 -0500
  Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-06 22:25 -0500
    Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:15 -0500
      Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is still cartoon blind) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 22:23 -0500
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 12:24 -0500
          Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-09 06:41 +0200
          Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael facing: global collapse then ensued) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-09 17:20 -0500
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael runs from the same issue NIST ran from) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-08 12:39 -0500
      Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-08 06:41 +0200
        Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael proved he is cartoon blind) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-09-09 06:11 +0200
  Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (K proves he can not recognize where debris came from) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 08:52 -0500
    Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 15:20 -0500
      Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (Michael fails to address certain issues again) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 20:46 -0500
    Re: WTC 7 NIST Cartoon vs. Reality (2 Michael a better desc) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-09-07 16:59 -0500

csiph-web