Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #534374
| Subject | Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
| References | <Aa2dnRf30aK5yNPLnZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <5242ic-k2l.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <db8f8dF3imrU1@mid.individual.net> <ANmdneoIQpl6odLLnZ2dnUU7-Y_OydjZ@giganews.com> <n2nfs6$cjl$1@dont-email.me> |
| From | Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> |
| Date | 2015-11-21 11:51 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <QoadnS1xaMSXPM3LnZ2dnUU7-QednZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink) |
On 20/11/2015 10:59 AM, Poutnik wrote: > Einstein was not focused on proving static universe. > > Einstein was focused on fitting the GR on experimental data, > as data were saying in his time that universe was static, > in contrary to GR, saying it should be dynamic. > > When universe expansion was discovered, > Einstein stated it was his biggest mistake > to introduce the cosmological constant into GR.. > > As accelerated expansion was discovered recently, > it seems it was not a mistake. It was a mistake in the sense that he was looking for a Dark Energy that would exactly balance the expansion rate and make it static. Instead we got a Dark Energy that supercharges the expansion rate. Yousuf Khan
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 17:03 -0600
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-19 23:54 +0000
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 19:23 -0600
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-20 02:45 +0000
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-20 06:41 -0500
Re: How could Einstein have known that, back in 1917 ? ! Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 06:06 -0800
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 09:31 -0600
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 16:59 +0100
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 10:03 -0600
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-11-21 11:51 -0500
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-20 15:24 -0500
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-20 14:04 -0800
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 17:06 -0600
Re: How could Einstein have known that, back in 1917 ? ! "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 13:32 -0800
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-11-21 11:36 -0500
Re: How could Einstein have known that, back in 1917 ? ! Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-11-21 11:47 -0500
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-11-20 16:17 -0500
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 17:07 -0600
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 23:26 -0800
csiph-web