Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics > #534261
| Newsgroups | sci.physics |
|---|---|
| Date | 2015-11-20 14:04 -0800 |
| References | <Aa2dnRf30aK5yNPLnZ2dnUU7-I-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <5242ic-k2l.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <db8f8dF3imrU1@mid.individual.net> <ANmdneoIQpl6odLLnZ2dnUU7-Y_OydjZ@giganews.com> |
| Message-ID | <e684f566-e4e1-4a83-b58a-e1bb9bbfc82a@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols |
| From | Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> |
On Friday, November 20, 2015 at 7:31:55 AM UTC-8, Sam Wormley wrote: > On 11/20/15 5:41 AM, dvus wrote: > > On 11/19/2015 6:54 PM, jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote: > >> Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols > >>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJsFsjSWYx0 > >>> > >>> > >>>> Albert Einstein did amazing things with General Relativity - but he > >>>> famously got it wrong when it came to the expansion of the Universe. > >>>> > >>>> Einstein's Blackboard: https://youtu.be/KIwpGEvmgvs > >>>> > >>>> More relativity videos (with Mike Merrifield): http://bit.ly/Gamma3 > >>>> > >>>> More long interviews with Ed: http://bit.ly/CopelandGoesLong > > > > I watched the first video and was left wondering why Einstein was so > > invested in proving the Universe was static. He proved himself quite > > able to think outside the box in most endeavors with the exception of > > this particular question. > > > > I does seem mysterious the effort to defend a static universe. It also > is curious that after 1931, Einstein pretty much abandoned doing > anything with general relativity. > > I guess we should be satisfied the Einstein gave us a fruitful > relativity theory and contributed in many ways to the quantum > mechanics. Einstein was always right, you know. Double-A
Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 17:03 -0600
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-19 23:54 +0000
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-19 19:23 -0600
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-11-20 02:45 +0000
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-20 06:41 -0500
Re: How could Einstein have known that, back in 1917 ? ! Mahipal <mahipal7638@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 06:06 -0800
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 09:31 -0600
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Poutnik <Poutnik4NNTP@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 16:59 +0100
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 10:03 -0600
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-11-21 11:51 -0500
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols dvus <dven1@adelphia.net> - 2015-11-20 15:24 -0500
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2015-11-20 14:04 -0800
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 17:06 -0600
Re: How could Einstein have known that, back in 1917 ? ! "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 13:32 -0800
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-11-21 11:36 -0500
Re: How could Einstein have known that, back in 1917 ? ! Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-11-21 11:47 -0500
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Yousuf Khan <bbbl67@spammenot.yahoo.com> - 2015-11-20 16:17 -0500
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-11-20 17:07 -0600
Re: Einstein's Famous Blunder - Sixty Symbols "Y.Porat" <y.y.porat@gmail.com> - 2015-11-21 23:26 -0800
csiph-web