Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc, alt.folklore.computers |
| Subject | Re: [CM] Why did Borland fail? |
| Date | 2015-06-15 11:32 +0000 |
| Organization | "Have EDDT, will travel" |
| Message-ID | <PM0005188CF7550AF1@aca24c83.ipt.aol.com> (permalink) |
| References | <mlj48r$esq$1@solani.org> <mlj48r$esq$1@solani.org> <mlj48r$esq$1@solani.org> <cu5bfbFqdekU2@mid.individual.net> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Sylvia Else wrote: > On 14/06/2015 3:42 PM, RS Wood wrote: >> From the «miss those guys» department: >> Title: Why did Borland fail? >> Author: >> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:24:24 -0400 >> Link: http://www.quora.com/Why-did-Borland-fail/answer/Danny-Thorpe?share=1& >> >> Comments[1] >> >> Links: >> [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9712267 (link) >> >> >> -- >> Posting to comp.misc, sci.misc, and misc.news.internet.discuss >> > > Yes, management regards developers as plug-compatible bodies. We trained our management so that would not happen. /BAH
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[CM] Why did Borland fail? RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-06-14 05:42 +0000
Re: [CM] Why did Borland fail? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-06-14 22:47 +1000
Re: [CM] Why did Borland fail? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-06-15 11:32 +0000
csiph-web