Re: [CM] Why did Borland fail?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!news.glorb.com!peer02.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!news7
From	jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com>
Newsgroups	comp.misc, alt.folklore.computers
Subject	Re: [CM] Why did Borland fail?
Date	15 Jun 2015 11:32:01 GMT
Organization	"Have EDDT, will travel"
Lines	24
Message-ID	<PM0005188CF7550AF1@aca24c83.ipt.aol.com> (permalink)
References	<mlj48r$esq$1@solani.org> <mlj48r$esq$1@solani.org> <mlj48r$esq$1@solani.org> <cu5bfbFqdekU2@mid.individual.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host	pe7a093237f24a1d460fbf39ea9c44f4069d851a35d439ac8.newsdawg.com
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
User-Agent	Pineapple News/0.9.0 (Mac OS X 10.4.9 PowerPC)
X-Registered-To	[Registered Name]
X-Program-URL	http://www.platinumball.net/pineapple/news/macosx/
X-Received-Bytes	1448
X-Received-Body-CRC	2938890154
Xref	csiph.com comp.misc:7917

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Sylvia Else wrote:
> On 14/06/2015 3:42 PM, RS Wood wrote:
>>  From the «miss those guys» department:
>> Title: Why did Borland fail?
>> Author:
>> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2015 15:24:24 -0400
>> Link:
http://www.quora.com/Why-did-Borland-fail/answer/Danny-Thorpe?share=1&
>>
>> Comments[1]
>>
>> Links:
>> [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9712267 (link)
>>
>>
>> --
>> Posting to comp.misc, sci.misc, and misc.news.internet.discuss
>>
>
> Yes, management regards developers as plug-compatible bodies.

We trained our management so that would not happen.

/BAH

Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

[CM] Why did Borland fail? RS Wood  <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2015-06-14 05:42 +0000
  Re: [CM] Why did Borland fail? Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-06-14 22:47 +1000
    Re: [CM] Why did Borland fail? jmfbahciv <See.above@aol.com> - 2015-06-15 11:32 +0000

csiph-web