Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.astronomy > #274447

Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim)

From "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net>
Newsgroups alt.astronomy, alt.conspiracy, sci.physics
References (1 earlier) <s63abc-bei.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <n-GdncJAUulY9H_InZ2dnUU7-VGdnZ2d@giganews.com> <c7aabc-94j.ln1@mail.specsol.com> <Tv2dnfEPMa1L-H7InZ2dnUU7-IudnZ2d@giganews.com> <m37cbc-ump.ln1@mail.specsol.com>
Subject Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim)
Date 2015-08-30 16:23 -0500
Message-ID <OYqdnZJua7ds7n7InZ2dnUU7-ImdnZ2d@giganews.com> (permalink)

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

<jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message 
news:m37cbc-ump.ln1@mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Rocky <wookiee@att.net> wrote:
>
>> FYI I downloaded all the NIST reports before they broke them into pieces 
>> and
>> made the hard to make heads or tails out of them.
>
> OK, so you downloaded them.
>
> Did you read and understand them?

I looked for the blood and guts and all I could see was they were only 
hypotheses where their test were not real world test but test run on 
cartoons.  <G>


>> Where the Twin Towers are concerned NIST lied about the facts they 
>> learned
>> from their real life experiments as proven by Kevin Ryan who was in on 
>> those
>> test.
>
> One guy making a youtube video proves nothing.

But it was not one guy there was input from quite a few people.  DUH.


>> And as I've stated before NIST didn't do anything to explain why so much 
>> of
>> the Twin Towers remained standing.  See:
>>  http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg
>
> Random chance, get over it.

ROTFLMAO  That bullshit might be acceptable if it only happend to one of the 
Twin Towers but it happened to both of them.  See for yourself:
 http://www.veteranstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/blast3.jpeg

>> But the photo above considers where underground nukes would have to be
>> placed to leave the walls standing from the Twin Towers standing strong.
>
> Wild conjecture.

And neither you or NIST have any reason why outside walls of both the Twin 
Towers stood strong but people that know about NCDs do.  <G>


>> Where WTC7 is concerned NIST tried to hide the fact that WTC7 fell at 
>> 100%
>> free fall for the first 100+ feet by using averages.  And nobody cares 
>> about
>> what happened to WTC7 after those first 100 feet because it is the first 
>> 100
>> feet is consistent with a "Controlled Demolition."  DUH.
>
> As the fall wasn't instrumented, all anyone can do is us averages of
> whatever data is available.

Doesn't matter because WTC7 clearly came down in a symetrical fashion and 
NIST never addressed that issue either.  As a matter of fact the cartoon 
that NIST made of WTC7 does not even show the symetrical aspect of WTC7. 
See:

WTC 7 NIST Model vs. Reality
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FuyZJl9YleY

> How it fell for the first 100 feet is consistant with a LOT of other
> things.

And your outright lie is based on what website?  If there is one.  <G>

> So you downloaded the NIST reports but didn't read them

It is you who has not read them or you would know they only have hypothesis 
and cartoons and nothing of any substance.  <G>

Since all you did was pile on your bullshit deeper and deeper I had to flush 
the rest of your post.  DUH

Rocky

Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

"Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 19:05 -0500
  Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 20:42 -0500
    Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:38 -0500
    Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (link fixed) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:35 +0000
  Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 01:34 +0000
    Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-29 21:25 -0500
      Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-29 22:37 -0500
        Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:37 -0500
          Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:58 +0000
            Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:33 -0500
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 23:04 +0000
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:35 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 02:00 +0000
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 21:58 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-31 03:21 +0000
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (THE NO PLANES MOVIE) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 06:28 +0200
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the lies of Jim + VT link) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-31 09:56 +0100
          Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (the synchronization flash for gliber34 Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
      Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (9/11-the smoking gun) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 03:34 +0000
        Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 15:23 -0500
          Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 20:53 +0000
            Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 16:23 -0500
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Tony Dragon <tony.dragon@btinternet.com> - 2015-08-30 23:17 +0100
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) jimp@specsol.spam.sux.com - 2015-08-30 23:01 +0000
              Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 02:37 +0200
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:00 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:18 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:27 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:36 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:45 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:58 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 22:59 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (Note 4 %) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 21:14 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "K Wills (Shill #3)" <compuelf@gmail.com> - 2015-08-31 04:29 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:42 -0500
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) "%" <persent@gmail.com> - 2015-08-30 20:18 -0700
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (NIST lies 4 Jim) Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler Emeritus <FNVWe@altusenetkooks.xxx> - 2015-08-31 07:27 +0200
                Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed (FNN is using outright lies) "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 20:45 -0500
  Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed Shoe-Chucker 2 <georgewk10@yahoo.com> - 2015-08-30 07:23 -0700
    Re: "Nuke cancer" from 9/11 revealed "Rocky" <wookiee@att.net> - 2015-08-30 11:37 -0500

csiph-web