Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1280229

Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang

From "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang
Date 2026-01-30 13:50 +0100
Message-ID <MiW6J-esBy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <M4O93-4PVD-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LA5Sx-1iHR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <M52Yp-4ZGk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LA5Sx-1iHR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <M52Yp-4ZGk-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

Am 23.12.25 um 05:31 schrieb Tianon Gravi:
> Whether we do test rebuilds or not, we definitely need to coordinate a
> transition with the release team - in fact, we probably *should* coordinate
> a transition for every upload of src:golang-X.Y also, but I'm not sure and
> it's probably worth double checking that we haven't been causing unnecessary
> excess labor for them.
> 
> Quoting from https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions, which
> contains the relevant text:
> 
>> The Release Team considers everything a transition where the upload of a
>> package requires changes (rebuilds or actual patches) to reverse
>> dependencies.

Hi Tianon,

sorry for my late reply. I'd like to get this going again, as you've 
already prepared golang 1.26 (thanks for that, by the way!).

I think by now it might make more sense to skip 1.25 entirely and bump 
the -defaults package to 1.26 directly, because the stable release of 
1.26 is probably not far away.

If we need to do a test rebuild, I think it's better to wait a little 
longer for 1.26 and start the rebuilds with the new version, instead of 
rebuilding now with 1.25 and doing the same for 1.26 in two or three weeks.

Anyway, about the rebuilding and transition: Have you had the chance to 
reach out to the release team, to ask them about their view on this 
matter? Do they think that a transition is necessary?

If not, I'd be happy to write them a mail, but I thought I'd ask you 
first, because it seems that you've been doing most (if not all) of the 
new golang compiler uploads.

Regards,
Tobias

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org> - 2025-12-22 14:30 +0100
  Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang Tianon Gravi <tianon@debian.org> - 2025-12-23 06:20 +0100
    Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org> - 2026-01-30 13:50 +0100
      Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang Tianon Gravi <tianon@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 10:50 +0100
        Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 22:50 +0100

csiph-web