Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1280296

Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang

From Tianon Gravi <tianon@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang
Date 2026-01-31 10:50 +0100
Message-ID <MjfM5-eFzP-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <LA5Sx-1iHR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <M52Yp-4ZGk-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <MiW6J-esBy-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <LA5Sx-1iHR-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <MiW6J-esBy-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 at 04:40, Dr. Tobias Quathamer <toddy@debian.org> wrote:
> Am 23.12.25 um 05:31 schrieb Tianon Gravi:
> > Whether we do test rebuilds or not, we definitely need to coordinate a
> > transition with the release team - in fact, we probably *should* coordinate
> > a transition for every upload of src:golang-X.Y also, but I'm not sure and
> > it's probably worth double checking that we haven't been causing unnecessary
> > excess labor for them.
> >
> > Quoting from https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions, which
> > contains the relevant text:
> >
> >> The Release Team considers everything a transition where the upload of a
> >> package requires changes (rebuilds or actual patches) to reverse
> >> dependencies.
>
> Hi Tianon,
>
> sorry for my late reply. I'd like to get this going again, as you've
> already prepared golang 1.26 (thanks for that, by the way!).
>
> I think by now it might make more sense to skip 1.25 entirely and bump
> the -defaults package to 1.26 directly, because the stable release of
> 1.26 is probably not far away.
>
> If we need to do a test rebuild, I think it's better to wait a little
> longer for 1.26 and start the rebuilds with the new version, instead of
> rebuilding now with 1.25 and doing the same for 1.26 in two or three weeks.
>
> Anyway, about the rebuilding and transition: Have you had the chance to
> reach out to the release team, to ask them about their view on this
> matter? Do they think that a transition is necessary?
>
> If not, I'd be happy to write them a mail, but I thought I'd ask you
> first, because it seems that you've been doing most (if not all) of the
> new golang compiler uploads.

Unfortunately, I haven't gotten to writing such a mail -- I did the
recent uploads because they were security-related. 😬

If you'd like to do so, please do!  That would be very helpful. 😄

♥,
- Tianon

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org> - 2025-12-22 14:30 +0100
  Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang Tianon Gravi <tianon@debian.org> - 2025-12-23 06:20 +0100
    Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org> - 2026-01-30 13:50 +0100
      Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang Tianon Gravi <tianon@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 10:50 +0100
        Bug#1116589: New upstream of golang "Dr. Tobias Quathamer" <toddy@debian.org> - 2026-01-31 22:50 +0100

csiph-web