Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.checkmate > #227419

Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist...

From Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com>
Newsgroups alt.checkmate, alt.fan.cyberchicken, alt.usenet.kooks
Subject Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist...
Date 2018-11-17 20:28 -0800
Organization Altopia Corp. - Usenet Access - www.altopia.com
Message-ID <MPG.365a8a3424215f41995729@news.altopia.com> (permalink)
References <mrnuud1d0hg852qer6qvdfmrc0nlijv6vm@4ax.com> <bokdk7.3oi.19.1@news.alt.net> <MPG.3659543dfcb6859a9956f9@news.altopia.com> <bokost.hvp.19.1@news.alt.net> <ou81vd9ceth13etrhn161mbi5hbhibv25k@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


Warning! Always wear ANSI approved safety goggles when reading posts by 
Checkmate!  In article <ou81vd9ceth13etrhn161mbi5hbhibv25k@4ax.com>, 
greghall@yacht_maester.fake says...


<)--->
<)--->On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 21:54:01 -0600, "Ms Kitty" <MsKitty@meow.mix> wrote:
<)--->
<)--->>Neal, you are doing exactly what you got on Checkmate for doing with the 
<)--->>arrows.  Not to mention the groups you crossposted.
<)--->>
<)--->>Froggery!
<)--->
<)--->Sorry, but that is just not the case. But, I forgive
<)--->you your ignorance as you arrived late. Here's what
<)--->has transpired.
<)--->
<)--->Checkjerk started using stupid, long, non-standard
<)--->attribution 


Time to dial your Wayback Machine a little farther back, Fuckwaddler.  
You know... to the reason I started putting all the hash in the 
attribution in the first place.  YOU instigated this by forging posts 
from me, Pandora, and others, creating unnecessary chaos in here, as 
demonstrated by MK STILL trying to make sense out of all your shit.  My 
hashed-up attribution symbols were added to make it more difficult for 
you to forge me.  You can call it a "froggery" if you think that excuses 
you, but the intent was clearly to fuck up everyone else's Usenet 
Experience.  This behavior will not be tolerated by me.  You were warned, 
and you chose to behave like the spoiled, addled-brain senile old 
socially-challenged asshole you've always been.  Too bad for you, because 
I was the one ally you still had in here, and virtually everyone is 
delighted to see how you fucked that up.



<)--->and I kicked his fat ass to the curb for
<)--->it. He got pissed off and started acting like a little
<)--->bitch and created a sock called Sir Gaygory's Owner.
<)--->
<)--->In retaliation, I started frogging him right and left
<)--->and he got his little pink bitch panties all in a wad 
<)--->and he said he'd *take care of me* and  *report me* 
<)--->to CC for forging him but CC just laughed his ass off 
<)--->upon hearing Checkbaby cry forgery when froggery
<)--->was the actual case.
<)--->
<)--->This made Checktears even more enraged so he
<)--->hatched a plot where in his feeble mind he figured
<)--->he'd then be able to report me for a real forgery.
<)--->
<)--->I had been frogging him using *ricksabain@gmail.com*
<)--->which is the switcheroo you noticed so what did my
<)--->little bitch boi do? He registered *ricksabain@gmail.com*
<)--->as his own.  He did this figuring to cause my froggery
<)--->to become a real forgery and then he'd have me TOSed.
<)--->
<)--->But, Checkloser didn't count on the fact that I read 
<)--->headers while he's too fucking lazy to and I noticed
<)--->right away he, all of a sudden, had changed from 
<)--->ricksabian@gmail.com (he's the owner of that one) to
<)--->ricksabain@gmail.com (just registered as his own) 
<)--->so, in order to not get caught engaging in forging, I
<)--->immediately changed my Checkmate sock puppet to
<)--->ricksabain@gmail.con and so easily thwarted his lame
<)--->attempt to netKKKop me that I gave him hemorrhoids
<)--->because, wait for it... *henceforth* he was clenching 
<)--->his gay ass so tightly together in utter frustration.
<)--->
<)--->LOL. He bragged publicly how he was going to get 
<)--->rid of me and put me to shame and it backfired because
<)--->I'm just so much more intelligent than he is. He thought
<)--->his little scheme foolproof but, instead, it made a fool
<)--->out of him because I caught him in the act. 
<)--->
<)--->>"Checkmate" <ricksabain1@gmail.com> wrote in message 
<)--->>news:MPG.3659543dfcb6859a9956f9@news.altopia.com...
<)--->
<)--->Yes, the above is the real Checkbaby after having 
<)--->registered my switcheroo as his own.
<)--->
<)--->Get it now?  NEVER has the Checkwannabe been so sorely
<)--->put to.  He knows the name of his nemesis. LOL.
<)--->
<)---><...>


Thanks for confirming that my plan worked.  Yes, I did register that 
email addy, and you only found out when CC spanked you for forging it.  
Again, I WIN!  

LOLLITY-LOL-LOL-LOL!

Sir Gaygory:    :^D ~===3

-- 
Checkmate ® 
Author, Humorist, Cynic
Philosopher, Humanitarian
Poet, Elektrishun to the Stars
Usenet Shot-Caller           
Copyright © 2018 
all rights reserved

In loving memory of The Battle Kitten
May 2010-February 12, 2017

"There are many here among us, 
who feel that life is but a joke."

"I am the author of nearly as much kook butthurt as 
kensi."    -Nadegda  
Message-ID: <pbg8ne$p9k$21@dont-email.me>

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-16 19:32 -0500
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 17:41 -0700
    Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:25 -0800
      Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Ms Kitty" <MsKitty@meow.mix> - 2018-11-16 21:54 -0600
        Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-17 18:50 -0500
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 16:54 -0700
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 18:59 -0500
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-17 19:14 -0500
              Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 19:19 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-17 19:30 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 19:33 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 17:45 -0700
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 20:28 -0800
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... turkey <turkey@invalid.none> - 2018-11-17 20:30 -0500
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-18 08:40 -0500
              Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-18 10:51 -0800
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yacht_maester.fake> - 2018-11-18 11:20 -0500
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-16 21:41 -0500
    Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 10:53 -0600
      Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 12:29 -0500
        Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2018-11-17 14:05 -0600
          Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 16:57 -0500
            Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 14:58 -0700
              Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:19 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 15:21 -0700
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... mixed nuts <melopsitticus@undulatus.budgie> - 2018-11-17 17:55 -0500
                Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... % <persent@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 16:09 -0700
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Checkmate <ricksabain1@gmail.com> - 2018-11-16 22:24 -0800
  Re: Would that kensi were a REAL astrophysicist... Bob Robertson <bobrobertsontsy66@gmail.com> - 2018-11-17 11:49 -0600

csiph-web