Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.raspberry-pi > #11940
| From | Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.raspberry-pi |
| Subject | Re: Direct digital I/O ? |
| Date | 2016-06-15 16:46 +0100 |
| Organization | PC Services |
| Message-ID | <MPG.31cb88ca6a3381a9989802@172.16.0.1> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <njmvm0$8us$1@dont-email.me> <dhkvlb14cq5gtjfmbe9ieo51p5tikitqm1@4ax.com> <njq770$ao1$2@dont-email.me> <n062mbl6d6ukg8rpa12lqaps0vq520hfk4@4ax.com> <njrqdl$3dk$2@dont-email.me> |
In article <njrqdl$3dk$2@dont-email.me>, gnuarm@gmail.com says... > > On 6/15/2016 4:57 AM, Gordon Levi wrote: > > rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> On 6/14/2016 5:48 AM, Mike Fleming wrote: > >>> In article <njmvm0$8us$1@dont-email.me>, "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" > >>> <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> writes: > >>> > >>>> "rickman" <gnuarm@gmail.com> wrote in message > >>>> news:njmtr1$g4$1@dont-email.me... > >>>>> I see the guy is giving you a hard time. He really is a troll and the > >>>>> best thing to do is to *totally* ignore him. Don't respond even to tell > >>>>> him you are ignoring him. I don't think that is going to happen in this > >>>>> group, but it would be for the best. > >>>> > >>>> Why not put your money where your mouth is and give examples of where > >>>> you say that I have trolled? > >>> > >>> You have persistently trolled on uk.net.news.config and > >>> uk.net.news.management, where you are one of the most universally > >>> despised and hated posters. I see your ambition has increased. > >> > >> I am really sorry to see the infection has spread to > >> comp.sys.raspberry-pi. I hope that people here can see how important it > >> is to not respond to trolls. This guy has ruined a number of groups. > > > > Any reputable news client can block his posts and all replies. If you > > never have to see them how can his posts ruin a news group? > > I have him killfiled in a number of groups. But the thread still shows > up because people keep replying to him. I can manually ignore a thread > which I should do with this one. ditto -- Paul Carpenter | paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk <http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/> PC Services <http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/pi/> Raspberry Pi Add-ons <http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/fonts/> Timing Diagram Font <http://www.badweb.org.uk/> For those web sites you hate
Back to comp.sys.raspberry-pi | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-09 14:47 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? GlowingBlueMist <GlowingBlueMist@blackhole.io> - 2016-06-09 11:22 -0500
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> - 2016-06-09 19:56 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-10 19:55 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-10 22:27 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-06-11 07:45 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-11 08:37 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-11 09:41 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "Dave Liquorice" <allsortsnotthisbit@howhill.com> - 2016-06-11 11:17 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-11 14:00 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? cb@elaine.df.lth.se (Christian Brunschen) - 2016-06-11 16:12 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-12 22:00 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? cb@elaine.df.lth.se (Christian Brunschen) - 2016-06-12 22:40 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-13 11:02 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-12 22:04 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-11 13:49 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Rob <nomail@example.com> - 2016-06-11 09:23 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> - 2016-06-11 10:47 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-06-11 12:46 -0400
Re: Direct digital I/O ? mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-06-12 09:20 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Michael J. Mahon <mjmahon@aol.com> - 2016-06-12 11:07 -0500
Re: Direct digital I/O ? andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2016-06-12 16:13 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? jeffj@panix.com (Jeff Jonas) - 2016-07-01 20:39 -0400
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-02 10:40 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-07-02 13:55 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-07-02 19:22 +0300
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-07-02 17:47 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-07-02 17:07 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Tauno Voipio <tauno.voipio@notused.fi.invalid> - 2016-07-02 21:30 +0300
Re: Direct digital I/O ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-02 19:35 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Dave Higton <dave@davehigton.me.uk> - 2016-07-02 19:43 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-02 20:07 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? andrew@cucumber.demon.co.uk (Andrew Gabriel) - 2016-07-03 18:59 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "Ivan D. Reid" <Ivan.Reid@ivan.fsnet.co.uk> - 2016-07-03 19:15 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 14:23 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-13 14:13 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-13 15:09 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 17:48 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? mm0fmf <none@invalid.com> - 2016-06-13 17:45 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-13 17:04 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:13 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 17:47 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-13 17:49 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:07 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-13 14:25 -0400
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:45 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Jim H <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-13 20:14 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-14 09:38 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:57 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Mike Fleming <{mike}@tauzero.co.uk> - 2016-06-14 10:48 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-14 11:41 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-14 11:48 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-14 20:24 -0400
Re: Direct digital I/O ? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2016-06-15 08:13 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 03:26 -0400
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 08:54 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? AndyW <Andy@nojunqmail.com> - 2016-06-15 16:48 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-15 21:02 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2016-06-15 11:21 +0000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 16:21 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 08:52 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Gordon Levi <gordon@address.invalid> - 2016-06-15 18:57 +1000
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 10:28 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2016-06-15 10:57 -0400
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 16:23 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-15 16:46 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 17:04 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Rob Morley <nospam@ntlworld.com> - 2016-06-15 17:43 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-15 20:57 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? Paul <paul@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk> - 2016-06-13 17:46 +0100
Re: Direct digital I/O ? "gareth G4SDW GQRP #3339" <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> - 2016-06-13 19:06 +0100
csiph-web