Re: Salsa CI overload

From	Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.project
Subject	Re: Salsa CI overload
Date	2025-08-26 17:10 +0200
Message-ID	<Lo3t7-awry-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<LnLPz-ajYx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LnNeF-akMb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <LnWBj-arAd-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 2025-08-26 3 h 29 a.m., Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> writes:
> 
>> I feel like making people wait around for CI to run isn't a great use
>> of our collective time.
> 
> +1 to more Salsa CI runner resources.
> 
>> Generally though, Salsa CI is pretty underpowered, which definitely
>> slows down my Debian work. Running the Lintian testsuite (which is a
>> requirement to merge contributions) frequently takes more than 2 hours
>> to run. On my local machine at home, it takes around 4 minutes :(
> 
> What?  Do you have a pointer to a job where this happen?  Are you sure
> you don't confuse queueing time with running time?  Salsa CI queueing
> time can be hours/days for the last few days, but my experience is that
> runtime is fairly okay once the job starts.
> 
> /Simon

The Lintian testsuite is pretty big (it builds ~1500 Debian packages and 
then runs Lintian on each of them) and the more CPU cores available, the 
fastest it is...

You'll find many examples of actual pipeline runtimes over 2h here: 
https://salsa.debian.org/lintian/lintian/-/pipelines

-- 
   ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
   ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
   ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   pollo@debian.org / veronneau.org
   ⠈⠳⣄

Thread

Salsa CI overload Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-08-25 22:20 +0200
  Re: Salsa CI overload Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2025-08-25 23:50 +0200
    Re: Salsa CI overload Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-08-26 09:50 +0200
      Re: Salsa CI overload Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2025-08-26 17:10 +0200
      Re: Salsa CI overload Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org> - 2025-09-05 03:20 +0200
        Re: Salsa CI overload Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2025-09-05 15:40 +0200
          Re: Salsa CI overload Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org> - 2025-09-05 19:40 +0200
            Re: Salsa CI overload Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2025-09-05 21:40 +0200
  Re: Salsa CI overload Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org> - 2025-08-27 00:30 +0200
    Re: Salsa CI overload Antoine Le Gonidec <vv221@debian.org> - 2025-08-27 01:30 +0200
      Re: Salsa CI overload Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-08-27 23:50 +0200
      Re: Salsa CI overload Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org> - 2025-08-28 09:30 +0200
        salsa: unconditional rebuild of all reverse dependencies on every push considered abuse (was "Salsa CI overload") Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2025-08-28 15:00 +0200
          Re: salsa: unconditional rebuild of all reverse dependencies on every push considered abuse (was "Salsa CI overload") Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org> - 2025-08-28 15:30 +0200
          Re: salsa: unconditional rebuild of all reverse dependencies on every push considered abuse (was "Salsa CI overload") Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2025-08-28 15:30 +0200
            Re: salsa: unconditional rebuild of all reverse dependencies on every push considered abuse (was "Salsa CI overload") Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2025-08-28 17:00 +0200
    Re: Salsa CI overload Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-08-27 11:40 +0200

csiph-web