Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #13912
| From | Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Salsa CI overload |
| Date | 2025-08-26 09:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <LnWBj-arAd-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <LnLPz-ajYx-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <LnNeF-akMb-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> writes: > I feel like making people wait around for CI to run isn't a great use > of our collective time. +1 to more Salsa CI runner resources. > Generally though, Salsa CI is pretty underpowered, which definitely > slows down my Debian work. Running the Lintian testsuite (which is a > requirement to merge contributions) frequently takes more than 2 hours > to run. On my local machine at home, it takes around 4 minutes :( What? Do you have a pointer to a job where this happen? Are you sure you don't confuse queueing time with running time? Salsa CI queueing time can be hours/days for the last few days, but my experience is that runtime is fairly okay once the job starts. /Simon
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Salsa CI overload Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-08-25 22:20 +0200
Re: Salsa CI overload Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2025-08-25 23:50 +0200
Re: Salsa CI overload Simon Josefsson <simon@josefsson.org> - 2025-08-26 09:50 +0200
Re: Salsa CI overload Louis-Philippe Véronneau <pollo@debian.org> - 2025-08-26 17:10 +0200
Re: Salsa CI overload Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org> - 2025-09-05 03:20 +0200
Re: Salsa CI overload Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2025-09-05 15:40 +0200
Re: Salsa CI overload Otto Kekäläinen <otto@debian.org> - 2025-09-05 19:40 +0200
Re: Salsa CI overload Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> - 2025-09-05 21:40 +0200
Re: Salsa CI overload Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org> - 2025-08-27 00:30 +0200
Re: Salsa CI overload Antoine Le Gonidec <vv221@debian.org> - 2025-08-27 01:30 +0200
Re: Salsa CI overload Soren Stoutner <soren@debian.org> - 2025-08-27 23:50 +0200
Re: Salsa CI overload Didier 'OdyX' Raboud <odyx@debian.org> - 2025-08-28 09:30 +0200
salsa: unconditional rebuild of all reverse dependencies on every push considered abuse (was "Salsa CI overload") Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2025-08-28 15:00 +0200
Re: salsa: unconditional rebuild of all reverse dependencies on every push considered abuse (was "Salsa CI overload") Jérémy Lal <kapouer@melix.org> - 2025-08-28 15:30 +0200
Re: salsa: unconditional rebuild of all reverse dependencies on every push considered abuse (was "Salsa CI overload") Marco d'Itri <md@Linux.IT> - 2025-08-28 15:30 +0200
Re: salsa: unconditional rebuild of all reverse dependencies on every push considered abuse (was "Salsa CI overload") Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> - 2025-08-28 17:00 +0200
Re: Salsa CI overload Ian Jackson <ijackson@chiark.greenend.org.uk> - 2025-08-27 11:40 +0200
csiph-web