Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.project > #13677

Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2

From Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
Newsgroups linux.debian.project
Subject Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2
Date 2025-01-25 18:40 +0100
Message-ID <K8Sit-bN0E-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <JFhkJ-6Hae-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <K8NiN-bJXM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <K8QgG-bLNm-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <K8R33-bMjQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <K8RFM-bMxL-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:37:48AM -0500, M. Zhou wrote:
> I'll focus on a simpler topic for the GR:
> 
> "how does Debian community interpret DFSG and software freedom
> against the AI model and software?"

Clarifying this officially seem indeed very useful, both for Debian and
for the free software world at large, due to how relevant Debian is as
one of the important gatekeepers of what is free-software-ok and what is
not. Many people out there, and possibly even within the project, are
assuming that the current Debian AI Policy is an official project
position, whereas it is not. It's important to ratify it somehow.

Since the last time this was discussed, did anyone reach out to FTP
master to understand *if* they currently have already an official answer
to this question or not? I'm Cc:-ing them explicitly with this message,
just in case.

Aside from the potential constitutional implications of this (last time
it felt like I was the only one worrying about this aspect, so I'm
dropping it), it would still be interesting to know their take. And it's
quite possible they would actively welcome/encourage an official
project-wide vote on this matter.

Cheers
-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli . zack@upsilon.cc . https://upsilon.cc/zack  _. ^ ._
Full professor of Computer Science              o     o   o     \/|V|\/
Télécom Paris, Polytechnic Institute of Paris     o     o o    </>   <\>
Co-founder & CSO Software Heritage            o o o     o       /\|^|/\
Mastodon: https://mastodon.xyz/@zacchiro                        '" V "'

Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Gerardo Ballabio <gerardo.ballabio@gmail.com> - 2024-11-04 12:00 +0100
  Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org> - 2024-11-05 03:20 +0100
    Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2025-01-25 13:20 +0100
      Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-01-25 16:30 +0100
        Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2025-01-25 16:40 +0100
          Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-01-25 17:20 +0100
        Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net> - 2025-01-25 17:20 +0100
          Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-01-25 18:00 +0100
            Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2025-01-25 18:40 +0100
            Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Ilu <ilulu@gmx.net> - 2025-01-25 18:50 +0100
              Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net> - 2025-01-25 19:00 +0100
              Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 16:50 +0100

csiph-web