Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #13677
| From | Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 |
| Date | 2025-01-25 18:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <K8Sit-bN0E-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <JFhkJ-6Hae-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <K8NiN-bJXM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <K8QgG-bLNm-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <K8R33-bMjQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <K8RFM-bMxL-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 11:37:48AM -0500, M. Zhou wrote: > I'll focus on a simpler topic for the GR: > > "how does Debian community interpret DFSG and software freedom > against the AI model and software?" Clarifying this officially seem indeed very useful, both for Debian and for the free software world at large, due to how relevant Debian is as one of the important gatekeepers of what is free-software-ok and what is not. Many people out there, and possibly even within the project, are assuming that the current Debian AI Policy is an official project position, whereas it is not. It's important to ratify it somehow. Since the last time this was discussed, did anyone reach out to FTP master to understand *if* they currently have already an official answer to this question or not? I'm Cc:-ing them explicitly with this message, just in case. Aside from the potential constitutional implications of this (last time it felt like I was the only one worrying about this aspect, so I'm dropping it), it would still be interesting to know their take. And it's quite possible they would actively welcome/encourage an official project-wide vote on this matter. Cheers -- Stefano Zacchiroli . zack@upsilon.cc . https://upsilon.cc/zack _. ^ ._ Full professor of Computer Science o o o \/|V|\/ Télécom Paris, Polytechnic Institute of Paris o o o </> <\> Co-founder & CSO Software Heritage o o o o /\|^|/\ Mastodon: https://mastodon.xyz/@zacchiro '" V "'
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Gerardo Ballabio <gerardo.ballabio@gmail.com> - 2024-11-04 12:00 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org> - 2024-11-05 03:20 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2025-01-25 13:20 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-01-25 16:30 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2025-01-25 16:40 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-01-25 17:20 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net> - 2025-01-25 17:20 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-01-25 18:00 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2025-01-25 18:40 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Ilu <ilulu@gmx.net> - 2025-01-25 18:50 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net> - 2025-01-25 19:00 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 16:50 +0100
csiph-web