Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2

From	"M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.project
Subject	Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2
Date	2025-01-25 18:00 +0100
Message-ID	<K8RFM-bMxL-19@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<JF2Yp-6y9e-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <JFhkJ-6Hae-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <K8NiN-bJXM-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <K8QgG-bLNm-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <K8R33-bMjQ-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 2025-01-25 at 17:08 +0100, Sam Johnston wrote:
> 
> The best time to do this was last year around the OSAID 1.0 release.
> The next best time is now. Do you need our help?
> 

I lean towards making things simpler.

Yes I disagree with OSI's decision on OSAID, and the definition
does not guarantee freedom at all. But a bold move towards picking
a fight against OSI on this matter through Debian General Resolution
sounds terrible and reckless to me.

I'll focus on a simpler topic for the GR:

"how does Debian community interpret DFSG and software freedom
against the AI model and software?"

I'll draft from a pure technical point of view. Neutral to
individuals and organizations, without commenting on how others
think and do. In that case it is as simply as elaborating the
"toxic candy" case, and analyzing the OSAID's implication from
a technical point of view.

In that sense, things will be more constructive and doable.
FSF will also able to learn from Debian's GR discussion.
I'll put my limited energy on this matter towards such direction.

Thread

Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Gerardo Ballabio <gerardo.ballabio@gmail.com> - 2024-11-04 12:00 +0100
  Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org> - 2024-11-05 03:20 +0100
    Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2025-01-25 13:20 +0100
      Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-01-25 16:30 +0100
        Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Sean Whitton <spwhitton@spwhitton.name> - 2025-01-25 16:40 +0100
          Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-01-25 17:20 +0100
        Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net> - 2025-01-25 17:20 +0100
          Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 "M. Zhou" <lumin@debian.org> - 2025-01-25 18:00 +0100
            Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2025-01-25 18:40 +0100
            Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Ilu <ilulu@gmx.net> - 2025-01-25 18:50 +0100
              Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net> - 2025-01-25 19:00 +0100
              Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 nick black <dankamongmen@gmail.com> - 2025-01-29 16:50 +0100

csiph-web