Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #618240
| Subject | Re: Pascal and Relativity |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| References | <9f416c8f-0fb7-4de3-8bc5-293ac6631721n@googlegroups.com> <hTDaPGXSJNO4E2wUTOtMFJFvfmQ@jntp> |
| From | "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> |
| Message-ID | <Jv_DM.689945$9wY2.414768@fx06.ams4> (permalink) |
| Organization | Eweka Internet Services |
| Date | 2023-08-19 09:51 +0200 |
Den 18.08.2023 22:23, skrev Richard Hachel: > Le 18/08/2023 à 20:53, patdolan a écrit : >> Tomorrow is the 361st anniversary of the death of Blaise Pascal. >> >> Dr. Hachel, would Pascal have accept relativity, either yours or >> Einstein's? >> > > It is absolutely impossible that Blaise Pascal accepted the relativity > of Einstein and Minkowski. > He had a powerful and honest thought. > He was of an intelligence well above the average, saw things only from > the angle of truth (and not boastfulness). He would have seen in less > than three minutes that Einstein's theory was mathematically absurd (it > has no chance of being true) and he would have spent his time, I think, > mocking it. > As for mine, I'm absolutely sure he would have thought about it. And, > seeing that it held the experimental road on everything, he would > probably have adopted it as a divine theory. > I don't say "divine theory" in the sense that what I said is divine, or > in the sense "Hachel is a genius", but in the sense, "This is the true > description of God's universe ". > Yes, I sincerely think that Pascal would have dubbed me, and that he > would have discreetly covered up the bullshit relating to Eisntein and > Minkowski in less than three minutes. > Which then poses a problem today: but where are the Pascals of our time? > We only see bullshit sheep. > > R.H. Since Richard Hachel believes he has invented a "Devine theory", he must believe he is God. Too much! This example of the Dunning–Kruger effect will be the last posting of Dr. Hachel I will ever read. <plonk> -- Paul https://paulba.no/
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pascal and Relativity patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-18 11:53 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-08-18 20:23 +0000
Re: Pascal and Relativity "Paul B. Andersen" <relativity@paulba.no> - 2023-08-19 09:51 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-08-19 12:08 +0000
Re: Pascal and Relativity Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-19 15:18 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity Python <python@invalid.org> - 2023-08-19 15:30 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity Emilio Zhimerin <znzi@rriemrom.ii> - 2023-08-19 13:40 +0000
Re: Pascal and Relativity patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-19 09:44 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 19:00 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 10:08 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-19 21:35 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-19 13:11 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity Richard Hachel <r.hachel@frite.fr> - 2023-08-20 17:40 +0000
Re: Pascal and Relativity "Dono." <eggy20011951@gmail.com> - 2023-08-21 11:06 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-19 10:17 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-08-19 19:24 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity Volney <volney@invalid.invalid> - 2023-08-21 10:20 -0400
Re: Pascal and Relativity nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2023-08-21 18:03 +0200
Re: Pascal and Relativity patdolan <patdolan@comcast.net> - 2023-08-21 09:46 -0700
Re: Pascal and Relativity Samsath Grosse <ohsh@smahhhas.ma> - 2023-08-23 09:58 +0000
csiph-web