Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #275643

Re: Jigdo images of Debian 3.1_r8

From "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: Jigdo images of Debian 3.1_r8
Date 2024-12-13 16:10 +0100
Message-ID <JTfsJ-gEBh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <JTdAB-gDos-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

> Everything is fine EXCEPT three files in debian-31r8-source-2.iso:
> pool/main/z/zope-quotafolder/zope-quotafolder_0.1.1.orig.tar.gz
> pool/main/s/sysvbanner/sysvbanner_1.0.orig.tar.gz
> pool/main/c/cl-md5/cl-md5_1.8.5.orig.tar.gz

"zope-quotafolder_0.1.1" is a known offender in the archives.
  https://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2020/05/msg00031.html
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779098
  https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/10/msg00442.html

The other two package names did not show up in that context.


> After trying a few other mirrors as suggested, I was able to get
> sysvbanner_1.0.orig.tar.gz from http://debian.ethz.ch/debian-archive/debian/
> [debian.ethz.ch]. No luck with the other two.

  https://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2020/05/msg00040.html
points to
  http://archive.debian.org/debian-amd64/pool/main/z/zope-quotafolder
for the .deb. But there is also a .orig.tar.gz file:
  http://archive.debian.org/debian-amd64/pool/main/z/zope-quotafolder/zope-quotafolder_0.1.1.orig.tar.gz


> * Both versions of cl-md5_1.8.5.orig.tar.gz have identical files. The
> archive seems to have been re-created later with exactly the same files.
> * Both versions of zope-quotafolder_0.1.1.orig.tar.gz have identical files.
> However, one (from Internet Archive) is a tar.gz inside a tar.gz, not the
> other.
> * Files from sysvbanner_1.0.orig.tar.gz are almost identical as well: in the
> file from Debian Archive it's a Makefile and a C source file. In the ISO
> from Internet Archive, it's a text file to be cut to extract the C file, and
> it's identical to the other one except some spacing and indentation.
>
> My question is thus: does anyone have any idea why and how this happened?

Looks like rogue fixing of packaging errors after upload.


Have a nice day :)

Thomas

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Jigdo images of Debian 3.1_r8 Jean-Claude Arbaut <arbautjc@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 14:10 +0100
  Re: Jigdo images of Debian 3.1_r8 "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2024-12-13 16:10 +0100

csiph-web