Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #275643
| From | "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Jigdo images of Debian 3.1_r8 |
| Date | 2024-12-13 16:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JTfsJ-gEBh-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JTdAB-gDos-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Hi, > Everything is fine EXCEPT three files in debian-31r8-source-2.iso: > pool/main/z/zope-quotafolder/zope-quotafolder_0.1.1.orig.tar.gz > pool/main/s/sysvbanner/sysvbanner_1.0.orig.tar.gz > pool/main/c/cl-md5/cl-md5_1.8.5.orig.tar.gz "zope-quotafolder_0.1.1" is a known offender in the archives. https://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2020/05/msg00031.html https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=779098 https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2020/10/msg00442.html The other two package names did not show up in that context. > After trying a few other mirrors as suggested, I was able to get > sysvbanner_1.0.orig.tar.gz from http://debian.ethz.ch/debian-archive/debian/ > [debian.ethz.ch]. No luck with the other two. https://lists.debian.org/debian-68k/2020/05/msg00040.html points to http://archive.debian.org/debian-amd64/pool/main/z/zope-quotafolder for the .deb. But there is also a .orig.tar.gz file: http://archive.debian.org/debian-amd64/pool/main/z/zope-quotafolder/zope-quotafolder_0.1.1.orig.tar.gz > * Both versions of cl-md5_1.8.5.orig.tar.gz have identical files. The > archive seems to have been re-created later with exactly the same files. > * Both versions of zope-quotafolder_0.1.1.orig.tar.gz have identical files. > However, one (from Internet Archive) is a tar.gz inside a tar.gz, not the > other. > * Files from sysvbanner_1.0.orig.tar.gz are almost identical as well: in the > file from Debian Archive it's a Makefile and a C source file. In the ISO > from Internet Archive, it's a text file to be cut to extract the C file, and > it's identical to the other one except some spacing and indentation. > > My question is thus: does anyone have any idea why and how this happened? Looks like rogue fixing of packaging errors after upload. Have a nice day :) Thomas
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Jigdo images of Debian 3.1_r8 Jean-Claude Arbaut <arbautjc@gmail.com> - 2024-12-13 14:10 +0100 Re: Jigdo images of Debian 3.1_r8 "Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> - 2024-12-13 16:10 +0100
csiph-web