Bug#1087816: lsdvd: misrepresents location of upstream source

From	Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.bugs.rc
Subject	Bug#1087816: lsdvd: misrepresents location of upstream source
Date	2024-12-08 22:30 +0100
Message-ID	<JRx0J-eZex-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<JKmWt-9Uda-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JRkGd-eDQ8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JRpmx-eKeX-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <JKmWt-9Uda-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JRpmx-eKeX-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

[наб]
> Because one of them says lsdvd and has lsdvd 0.17
> but the other one says acidrip and doesn't.

Ah, I was blind.  I only noticed the structure, not the details, of
those URLs.  I do not know if acidrip might distribute lsdvd or not, but
the lsdvd URL is a much better source.

> Thus, the one that says acidrip can't possibly fulfil policy 12.5.

Do not really know if this is true myself, and do not believe such
simple and most likely cut-n-paste typo in d/copyright is enough to ask
for the removal of lsdvd.  In any case, I hope the lsdvd maintainer got
time to look at this issue soon, to render the question moot.

In other news, I am working on preparing lsdvd 0.18, and hope to have it
stamped soon.  Will most likely not be able to release tarballs,
unfortunately, only tag the git repo. :)

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

Thread

Bug#1087816: lsdvd: misrepresents location of upstream source Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> - 2024-12-08 09:20 +0100
  Processed: Re: lsdvd: misrepresents location of upstream source "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-12-08 09:20 +0100
  Bug#1087816: lsdvd: misrepresents location of upstream source Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> - 2024-12-08 22:30 +0100
    Bug#1087816: lsdvd: misrepresents location of upstream source наб <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz> - 2024-12-08 22:50 +0100

csiph-web