Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #377865

Bug#1087816: lsdvd: misrepresents location of upstream source

From Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.rc
Subject Bug#1087816: lsdvd: misrepresents location of upstream source
Date 2024-12-08 09:20 +0100
Message-ID <JRkGd-eDQ8-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <JKmWt-9Uda-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JKmWt-9Uda-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Control: severity -1 normal

[наб]
> d/changelog says
>   lsdvd (0.17-1) unstable; urgency=low
>     * New upstream release, from new upstream and update copyright accordingly.
> but d/copyright still says
>   It was downloaded from http://sourceforge.net/projects/acidrip/
> whereas lsdvd 0.17 actually came from
>   https://qa.debian.org/watch/sf.php/lsdvd

This seem to be based on a misunderstanding.  The sf.php script is a
shim script making it easier to track new sourceforge.net releases in
d/watch files.  The 'sf' in sf.php stands for sourceforge.  Why do you
believe these two locations do not represent the same source?

-- 
Happy hacking
Petter Reinholdtsen

Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1087816: lsdvd: misrepresents location of upstream source Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> - 2024-12-08 09:20 +0100
  Processed: Re: lsdvd: misrepresents location of upstream source "Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org> - 2024-12-08 09:20 +0100
  Bug#1087816: lsdvd: misrepresents location of upstream source Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> - 2024-12-08 22:30 +0100
    Bug#1087816: lsdvd: misrepresents location of upstream source наб <nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz> - 2024-12-08 22:50 +0100

csiph-web