Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1218843
| From | Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package |
| Date | 2024-11-03 15:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JEJM6-6mr9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JyyJH-2eZE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <JyyJH-2eZE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <JyzcJ-2f9B-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JyyJH-2eZE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <JyzcJ-2f9B-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 03:47:10PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > fence-agents on plain bookworm is 216 MB including all its > dependencies, but I get what you're saying and agree. :) Seems like 1.8 GB is the latest number for unstable if all agents are installed, so 8x increase from bookworm: # apt install fence-agents fence-agents-amt fence-agents-aws fence-agents-azure-arm fence-agents-compute fence-agents-gce fence-agents-ironic fence-agents-openstack fence-agents-sbd ... Summary: Upgrading: 0, Installing: 578, Removing: 0, Not Upgrading: 0 Download size: 216 MB Space needed: 1815 MB / 137 GB available > That could be worth a thought, yes. Having a good upgrade path even > for users without Recommends enabled, but at the same time also > having the option to install only *certain* fence-agents is > definitely a worthwhile goal. :) How about including all the packages in Depends, but introducting a virtual package fence-agent: Package: fence-agents Depends: fence-agents-ack-manual, fence-agents-aliyun, fence-agents-alom, ... Package: fence-agents-ack-manual Provides: fence-agent Package: fence-agents-aliyun Provides: fence-agent Package: fence-agents-alom Provides: fence-agent Package: pacemaker Recommends: fence-agents | fence-agent, pacemaker-cli-utils Now during upgrade the users can select to install all agents with increased disk usage by default or to only keep the few agents they really need. -- Valentin
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2024-10-17 15:30 +0200
Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org> - 2024-10-17 16:00 +0200
Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2024-11-03 15:30 +0100
Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package Guillem Jover <gjover@sipwise.com> - 2024-11-04 14:40 +0100
Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package Ferenc Wágner <wferi@debian.org> - 2024-11-07 09:10 +0100
Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2024-11-10 18:00 +0100
csiph-web