Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1216660
| From | Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package |
| Date | 2024-10-17 15:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <JyyJH-2eZE-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JyyJH-2eZE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <JyyJH-2eZE-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 12:03:26PM +0200, Michael Prokop wrote: > And the package does *not* depend on all available fence agents, > they are only recommends. > > I'm aware that folks disabling Recommends are supposed to know what > they are doing. But at least in my experience avoiding Recommends is > a common practice esp. amongst server systems where fence-agents has > its use case. And if someone is upgrading fence-agents from bookworm > (v4.12.1-1) to trixie (v4.15.0-3) and isn't aware of this > fence-agents Recommends situation *upfront*, the system will end up > with this empty / broken fence-agents situation. Right, the split was done exactly to benefit server systems so they don't have to install 1GB of dependencies for agents they don't use. > IMO the fence-agents should: > > a) at least depend on fence-agents-common, and: Not sure how this helps with the transition? This is a common library and most agents depend on it directly. > b) a "fence-agents-all" package which *actually* depends on *all* > agent packages could further mitigate this situation (the > fence-agents package itself then could use fence-agents-all in its > Recommends). Would it be better for fence-agents-all to replace fence-agent than? -- Valentin
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2024-10-17 15:30 +0200
Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package Michael Prokop <mika@debian.org> - 2024-10-17 16:00 +0200
Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2024-11-03 15:30 +0100
Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package Guillem Jover <gjover@sipwise.com> - 2024-11-04 14:40 +0100
Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package Ferenc Wágner <wferi@debian.org> - 2024-11-07 09:10 +0100
Bug#1085256: fence-agents: fence-agents package does not depend on any actual package Valentin Vidic <vvidic@debian.org> - 2024-11-10 18:00 +0100
csiph-web