Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #13634
| From | David Bremner <david@tethera.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 |
| Date | 2024-10-27 17:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JCeCJ-4CiG-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JBToB-4oGn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <JCb29-4A3M-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JCdGF-4BJh-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> writes: > > I don't understand your argument that this decision is not in the realm > of the ftpmaster activities. How could it *not* be, given they are the > team deciding NEW queue acceptance, and that most notably they do so > based on licensing aspects? > I didn't really mean to trigger a governance debate, just express that I thought the decision at hand went beyond what I think of as ftp-master's mission. Policy 2.2.1 says "Every package in main must comply with the DFSG.", and then points to the ftp-master REJECT-FAQ as "the project’s current working interpretation of the DFSG." By "spirit of the delegation", I meant "interpreting the DFSG". For me training-data-less models are clearly incompatible with the DFSG, so I am uncomfortable with potentially accepting them as "interpreting the DFSG".
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org> - 2024-10-26 20:10 +0200
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2024-10-26 22:30 +0200
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 David Bremner <david@tethera.net> - 2024-10-27 14:00 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2024-10-27 16:50 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 David Bremner <david@tethera.net> - 2024-10-27 17:50 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2024-10-28 13:20 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2024-10-29 12:20 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-10-29 17:20 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2024-10-29 18:30 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2024-10-30 08:50 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2024-10-30 08:50 +0100
csiph-web