Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.project > #13638
| From | Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.project |
| Subject | Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 |
| Date | 2024-10-29 17:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <JCX6N-582o-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <JBToB-4oGn-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <JCSqt-55eh-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <JCSqt-55eh-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <JCX6N-582o-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 2024-10-29 17:45:20 +0200 (+0200), Jonathan Carter wrote: [...] > What is the OSI's motivation for creating such an incredibly lax definition > for open source AI? Meta is already calling their absolutely-not-open-source > model Open Source and promoting it as such, without as much as a *peep* from > the OSI condemning the abuse of the term. (although, while doing a quick > search to make sure that's true, I found this link from OSI to an article > that keeps insisting that LLama3 is open source: https://opensource.org/press-mentions/meta-inches-toward-open-source-ai-with-new-llama-3-1) [...] The earliest comment I'm aware of from them on that specific point is this article (2023-07-20): https://opensource.org/blog/metas-llama-2-license-is-not-open-source > > Meta is confusing “open source” with “resources available to > > some users under some conditions,” two very different things. > > We’ve asked them to correct their misstatement. -- Jeremy Stanley
Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org> - 2024-10-26 20:10 +0200
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2024-10-26 22:30 +0200
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 David Bremner <david@tethera.net> - 2024-10-27 14:00 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2024-10-27 16:50 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 David Bremner <david@tethera.net> - 2024-10-27 17:50 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2024-10-28 13:20 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2024-10-29 12:20 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-10-29 17:20 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2024-10-29 18:30 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2024-10-30 08:50 +0100
Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2024-10-30 08:50 +0100
csiph-web