Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.project > #13631

Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Sat, Oct 26, 2024 at 10:41:12AM -0700, Mo Zhou wrote:
> I drafted an unofficial document named ML-Policy[5]
>
> [5]: https://salsa.debian.org/deeplearning-team/ml-policy/-/blob/master/ML-Policy.rst
[...]
> Maybe it is time for us to build a consensus on how we tell whether a
> piece of AI is DFSG-compliant or not, instead of waiting for
> ftp-masters to interpret those binary blobs case-by-case.
> 
> Do we need a GR to reach a consensus?

A vote is not a good tool to build consensus (quite the contrary), but
it could be an effective decision-making tool.

Before getting in to that procedural question, though, do you (or
anyone) know what ftpmasters think of the ML-Policy? Because if, say,
they agree with it, it would be enough for them to adopt/endorse that
policy to turn it into the an official Debian policy on this matter.

(In case of doubt: mine is a real question, I have no idea what
fptmasters think about this matter. It just seems important to me to
find that out, before considering a GR that overlaps with ftpmasters'
delegated responsibilities.)

Cheers
-- 
Stefano Zacchiroli . zack@upsilon.cc . https://upsilon.cc/zack  _. ^ ._
Full professor of Computer Science              o     o   o     \/|V|\/
Télécom Paris, Polytechnic Institute of Paris     o     o o    </>   <\>
Co-founder & CSO Software Heritage            o o o     o       /\|^|/\
Mastodon: https://mastodon.xyz/@zacchiro                        '" V "'

Back to linux.debian.project | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Mo Zhou <lumin@debian.org> - 2024-10-26 20:10 +0200
  Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2024-10-26 22:30 +0200
  Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 David Bremner <david@tethera.net> - 2024-10-27 14:00 +0100
    Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2024-10-27 16:50 +0100
      Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 David Bremner <david@tethera.net> - 2024-10-27 17:50 +0100
  Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org> - 2024-10-28 13:20 +0100
  Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2024-10-29 12:20 +0100
    Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Jeremy Stanley <fungi@yuggoth.org> - 2024-10-29 17:20 +0100
    Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org> - 2024-10-29 18:30 +0100
    Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2024-10-30 08:50 +0100
  Re: Concerns regarding the "Open Source AI Definition" 1.0-RC2 Gunnar Wolf <gwolf@debian.org> - 2024-10-30 08:50 +0100

csiph-web