Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #567358

Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes.

From benj <none@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes.
References <w7KdnUqipoR9K2PLnZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@giganews.com> <b7a74af3-e325-46de-8592-1db67df9f570@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.1{2.30P.Seattle.2016}> <ndmvdo$6jb$1@pcls7.std.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.1{4.57P.Seattle.2016}>
Message-ID <I9GLy.708$C92.171@fx19.iad> (permalink)
Organization TeraNews.com
Date 2016-04-01 22:31 -0400

Show all headers | View raw


On 04/01/2016 07:57 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me wrote:
>
>
>     You (MichaelMoroney) replied (to me):
>     > > Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes.  For example:
>     > > The "black hole" notion violates the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.
>     >
>     > Why do you claim that?  The HUP states that you cannot know both the
>     > position and the momentum of something more accurately than a certain
>     > value.  Why do you believe something about black holes involves
>     > ultraprecise position and momentum knowledge?
>
>     Quoting
>     https://www.quora.com/Does-the-singularity-of-a-black-hole-violate-the-Heisenberg-uncertainty-principle
>     <<
>        According to general relativity,
>        no path in spacetime can leave the singularity within a black hole.
>
>        This means that the mass within the singularity has
>        a well defined location and momentum at the same time.  >>

Hint Rolf: Math is not reality.

-- 

       ___           ___           ___            ___
      /\  \         /\  \         /\__\          /\  \
     /::\  \       /::\  \       /::|  |         \:\  \
    /:/\:\  \     /:/\:\  \     /:|:|  |     ___ /::\__\
   /::\~\:\__\   /::\~\:\  \   /:/|:|  |__  /\  /:/\/__/
  /:/\:\ \:|__| /:/\:\ \:\__\ /:/ |:| /\__\ \:\/:/  /
  \:\~\:\/:/  / \:\~\:\ \/__/ \/__|:|/:/  /  \::/  /
   \:\ \::/  /   \:\ \:\__\       |:/:/  /    \/__/
    \:\/:/  /     \:\ \/__/       |::/  /
     \::/__/       \:\__\         /:/  /
      ~~            \/__/         \/__/

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 12:58 -0500
  p.e.a noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 13:47 -0700
  Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-01 14:02 -0700
    Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 16:20 -0500
    Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-01 23:15 +0000
      Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-02 01:49 +0000
        Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 20:00 -0700
        Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-02 19:03 +0000
          Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 05:04 +0000
            Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 02:01 -0400
            Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 06:23 +0000
              Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. xxein1@att.net - 2016-04-03 10:54 -0700
            Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-03 14:05 -0700
              Re: Loop Quantum Gravity. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-05 14:07 -0700
      Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 22:31 -0400
  Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-01 17:33 -0400
    Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-02 12:26 -0400
      Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-04 08:54 -0400
  Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-03 20:13 -0500

csiph-web