Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #567329

Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes.

From moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney)
Newsgroups sci.physics
Subject Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes.
Date 2016-04-01 23:15 +0000
Organization The World : www.TheWorld.com : Since 1989
Message-ID <ndmvdo$6jb$1@pcls7.std.com> (permalink)
References <w7KdnUqipoR9K2PLnZ2dnUU7-SudnZ2d@giganews.com> <b7a74af3-e325-46de-8592-1db67df9f570@googlegroups.com> <Jeff-Relf.Me@Apr.1{2.30P.Seattle.2016}>

Show all headers | View raw


Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> writes:

>Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes.  For example:
>The "black hole" notion violates the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.

Why do you claim that?  The HUP states that you cannot know both the 
position and the momentum of something more accurately than a certain
value.  Why do you believe something about black holes involves 
ultraprecise position and momentum knowledge?

Back to sci.physics | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 12:58 -0500
  p.e.a noTthaTguY <abu.kuanysh05@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 13:47 -0700
  Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? edprochak@gmail.com - 2016-04-01 14:02 -0700
    Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 16:20 -0500
    Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-01 23:15 +0000
      Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-02 01:49 +0000
        Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! "Ross A. Finlayson" <ross.finlayson@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 20:00 -0700
        Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-02 19:03 +0000
          Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 05:04 +0000
            Re: If you can't measure it, is it still science ? ! benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-03 02:01 -0400
            Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2016-04-03 06:23 +0000
              Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. xxein1@att.net - 2016-04-03 10:54 -0700
            Re: Stephen Hawking disagrees with you, Michael Moroney. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-03 14:05 -0700
              Re: Loop Quantum Gravity. Double-A <double-a3@hush.com> - 2016-04-05 14:07 -0700
      Re: Maths/Theories conflict, sometimes. benj <none@gmail.com> - 2016-04-01 22:31 -0400
  Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-01 17:33 -0400
    Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-02 12:26 -0400
      Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Wally W. <ww84wa@aim.com> - 2016-04-04 08:54 -0400
  Re: Why Do You Have Confidence That Math Is The Proper Language For Understanding Reality? Sergio <invalid@invalid.com> - 2016-04-03 20:13 -0500

csiph-web