Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #267415

Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive

From David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive
Date 2024-02-15 03:30 +0100
Message-ID <I7zFD-adNg-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <I7vC2-abtt-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I7y6R-acOg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <I7zmh-adGU-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On 2/14/24 18:06, gene heskett wrote:
> Will the by-id string fit in the space reserved for a label?That IF 
> there was a connection between the /dev/sdc that udev assigns and 
> anything in this list:
> 
> root@coyote:~# ls /dev/disk/by-id
> ata-ATAPI_iHAS424_B_3524253_327133504865 
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302509W-part1    wwn-0x5002538f413394a5
> ata-Gigastone_SSD_GST02TBG221146 
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302509W-part2 
> wwn-0x5002538f413394a5-part1
> ata-Gigastone_SSD_GST02TBG221146-part1 
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302509W-part3 
> wwn-0x5002538f413394a5-part2
> ata-Gigastone_SSD_GSTD02TB230102 
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_QVO_1TB_S5RRNF0T201730V wwn-0x5002538f413394a5-part3
> ata-Gigastone_SSD_GSTD02TB230102-part1 
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_QVO_1TB_S5RRNF0T201730V-part1    wwn-0x5002538f413394a9
> ata-Gigastone_SSD_GSTG02TB230206 
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_QVO_1TB_S5RRNF0T201730V-part2 
> wwn-0x5002538f413394a9-part1
> ata-Gigastone_SSD_GSTG02TB230206-part1 
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_QVO_1TB_S5RRNF0T201730V-part3 
> wwn-0x5002538f413394a9-part2
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302498T 
> ata-SPCC_Solid_State_Disk_AA231107S304KG00080 wwn-0x5002538f413394a9-part3
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302498T-part1 
> ata-SPCC_Solid_State_Disk_AA231107S304KG00080-part1  wwn-0x5002538f413394ae
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302498T-part2  md-name-coyote:0 
>                                 wwn-0x5002538f413394ae-part1
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302498T-part3 md-name-coyote:0-part1 
> wwn-0x5002538f413394ae-part2
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302502E        md-name-coyote:2 
>                                 wwn-0x5002538f413394ae-part3
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302502E-part1  md-name-_none_:1 
>                                 wwn-0x5002538f413394b0
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302502E-part2 
> md-uuid-3d5a3621:c0e32c8a:e3f7ebb3:318edbfb wwn-0x5002538f413394b0-part1
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302502E-part3 
> md-uuid-3d5a3621:c0e32c8a:e3f7ebb3:318edbfb-part1 
> wwn-0x5002538f413394b0-part2
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302507V 
> md-uuid-57a88605:27f5a773:5be347c1:7c5e7342 wwn-0x5002538f413394b0-part3
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302507V-part1 
> md-uuid-bb6e03ce:19d290c8:5171004f:0127a392          wwn-0x5002538f42205e8e
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302507V-part2 
> usb-SPCC_Sol_id_State_Disk_1234567897E6-0:0 wwn-0x5002538f42205e8e-part1
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302507V-part3 
> usb-SPCC_Sol_id_State_Disk_1234567897E6-0:0-part1 
> wwn-0x5002538f42205e8e-part2
> ata-Samsung_SSD_870_EVO_1TB_S626NF0R302509W 
> usb-USB_Mass_Storage_Device_816820130806-0:0 wwn-0x5002538f42205e8e-part3
> root@coyote:~#
> 
> I dare you to find the disk that udev calls sdc in the above wall of text.
> 
> Why can't you understand that I want a unique label for all of this 
> stuff that is NOT a wall of HEX numbers no one can remember.  Its not 
> mounted, so blkid does NOT see it.


For labeled disk partitions, use /dev/disk/by-label/* paths:

2024-02-14 18:22:34 root@taz ~
# ls -1 /dev/disk/by-label/
sda3_crypt
taz_boot
taz_root


David

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-14 23:10 +0100
  Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 01:50 +0100
    Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 03:10 +0100
      Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-15 03:30 +0100
      Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 17:00 +0100
    Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-15 03:20 +0100
    Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-02-15 03:20 +0100
      Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 04:10 +0100
    Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 04:00 +0100
      Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 17:20 +0100
        Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-15 17:30 +0100
        Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 21:30 +0100
          Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 21:50 +0100
            Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-15 22:30 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 07:40 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-16 15:50 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-17 03:20 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-17 06:50 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 07:40 +0100
                Of irrelevant chatter and meta-chatter [was: f3tools vs Silicon  Power 4T drive] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-17 09:50 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-17 18:50 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-18 02:30 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-16 21:10 +0100
            Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 22:50 +0100
            Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 02:50 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-02-16 13:50 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 16:40 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-16 16:00 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 21:20 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2024-02-16 21:50 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 22:10 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 22:20 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-02-17 21:20 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-17 03:30 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-17 06:40 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-17 06:40 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-18 02:10 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-18 07:50 +0100
          Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 21:00 +0100
    Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 17:10 +0100
      Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-02-15 18:40 +0100
        Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 20:50 +0100
          Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 22:10 +0100
            Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 22:30 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 07:20 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-16 15:40 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 21:30 +0100
            Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2024-02-15 23:40 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-02-16 08:50 +0100
            Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 21:10 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-16 21:10 +0100

csiph-web