Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #267456
| From | gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive |
| Date | 2024-02-16 07:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <I8037-atPg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <I7A8G-adXp-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <I7MCR-alK0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I7QwN-ao25-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <I7QQ9-ao8H-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I7RsR-aoAR-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On 2/15/24 16:20, David Wright wrote:
> On Thu 15 Feb 2024 at 20:44:52 (+0000), Andy Smith wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 03:19:54PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
>>> On 2/15/24 11:21, Andy Smith wrote:
>>>> You asked if "labels" would survive their associated partition being
>>>> put into LVM.
>>>>
>>>> I said, "yes if you mean partition names, no if you mean filesystem
>>>> labels".
>>>>
>>> I'm still confused and it is not all the well clarified by looking at
>>> gparted, a shot of which I posted.
>>
>> This could all be answered easily if you'd just post the copy-paste
>> of your terminal scrollback for what you actually did. Hopefully you
>> don't now object to me asking what you meant since apparently even
>> you do not know if you mean partition names or filesystem labels.
>> >From what you posted it now sounds like labels on the ext4
>> filesystems that you created.
>
> Gene effectively shoots himself in the foot by using gparted (GUI)
> instead of, say, gdisk where it's easy to paste what was done, or
> for someone, say me, to post an example:
>
> # gdisk /dev/sdz
> GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 1.0.3
>
> Partition table scan:
> MBR: not present
> BSD: not present
> APM: not present
> GPT: not present
>
> Creating new GPT entries.
>
> Command (? for help): o
> This option deletes all partitions and creates a new protective MBR.
> Proceed? (Y/N): y
>
> Command (? for help): p
> Disk /dev/sdb: 3907029168 sectors, 1.8 TiB
> Model: Desktop
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512/512 bytes
> Disk identifier (GUID): A1093790-9A1A-4A7E-A807-B9CC6F7CF77E
> Partition table holds up to 128 entries
> Main partition table begins at sector 2 and ends at sector 33
> First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 3907029134
> Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries
> Total free space is 3907029101 sectors (1.8 TiB)
>
> Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name
>
> Command (? for help): n
> Partition number (1-128, default 1):
> First sector (34-3907029134, default = 2048) or {+-}size{KMGTP}:
> Last sector (2048-3907029134, default = 3907029134) or {+-}size{KMGTP}:
> Current type is 'Linux filesystem'
> Hex code or GUID (L to show codes, Enter = 8300):
> Changed type of partition to 'Linux filesystem'
>
> Command (? for help): c
> Using 1
> Enter name: Lulu01
>
> Command (? for help): i
> Using 1
> Partition GUID code: 0FC63DAF-8483-4772-8E79-3D69D8477DE4 (Linux filesystem)
> Partition unique GUID: 37CF9EDF-C695-428E-9889-2F52C40DFCA5
> First sector: 2048 (at 1024.0 KiB)
> Last sector: 3907029134 (at 1.8 TiB)
> Partition size: 3907027087 sectors (1.8 TiB)
> Attribute flags: 0000000000000000
> Partition name: 'Lulu01'
>
> Command (? for help): w
>
> Final checks complete. About to write GPT data. THIS WILL OVERWRITE EXISTING
> PARTITIONS!!
>
> Do you want to proceed? (Y/N): y
> OK; writing new GUID partition table (GPT) to /dev/sdb.
> The operation has completed successfully.
> #
>
> # gdisk -l /dev/sdz
> GPT fdisk (gdisk) version 1.0.3
>
> Partition table scan:
> MBR: protective
> BSD: not present
> APM: not present
> GPT: present
>
> Found valid GPT with protective MBR; using GPT.
> Disk /dev/sdb: 3907029168 sectors, 1.8 TiB
> Model: Desktop
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512/512 bytes
> Disk identifier (GUID): A1093790-9A1A-4A7E-A807-B9CC6F7CF77E
> Partition table holds up to 128 entries
> Main partition table begins at sector 2 and ends at sector 33
> First usable sector is 34, last usable sector is 3907029134
> Partitions will be aligned on 2048-sector boundaries
> Total free space is 2014 sectors (1007.0 KiB)
>
> Number Start (sector) End (sector) Size Code Name
> 1 2048 3907029134 1.8 TiB 8300 Lulu01
> #
>
> Cheers,
> David.
>
> .
And this "partition" name survives?, and can be unique?, and can be used
in a mount cmd? That's how I'll do it then. This if all 3 questions
above can be answered with a yes is the answer I've been trying to
squeeze out all along. Thank you.
Cheers, Gene Heskett, CET.
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author, 1940)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-14 23:10 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 01:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 03:10 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-15 03:30 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 17:00 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-15 03:20 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-02-15 03:20 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 04:10 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 04:00 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 17:20 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-15 17:30 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 21:30 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 21:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-15 22:30 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 07:40 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-16 15:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-17 03:20 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-17 06:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 07:40 +0100
Of irrelevant chatter and meta-chatter [was: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-17 09:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-17 18:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-18 02:30 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-16 21:10 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 22:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 02:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-02-16 13:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 16:40 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-16 16:00 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 21:20 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2024-02-16 21:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 22:10 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 22:20 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-02-17 21:20 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-17 03:30 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-17 06:40 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-17 06:40 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-18 02:10 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-18 07:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 21:00 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 17:10 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-02-15 18:40 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 20:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 22:10 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 22:30 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 07:20 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-16 15:40 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 21:30 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2024-02-15 23:40 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-02-16 08:50 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 21:10 +0100
Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-16 21:10 +0100
csiph-web