Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #267434

Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive

From David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive
Date 2024-02-15 17:30 +0100
Message-ID <I7MMx-alN4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <I7vC2-abtt-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I7y6R-acOg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <I7z2W-adln-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <I7A8G-adXp-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <I7MCR-alK0-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu 15 Feb 2024 at 16:12:06 (+0000), Andy Smith wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 09:56:07PM -0500, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On 2/14/24 19:48, Andy Smith wrote:
> > > > I hope you are putting a level of redundancy under that LVM or are
> > > > using the redundancy features of LVM (which you need to go out of
> > > > your way to do). Otherwise by default what you'll have is not
> > > > redundant and a device failure will lose at least the contents of
> > > > that device, possibly more.
> > > > 
> > You pique my curiosity because this is going to be my backup system, but not
> > a syllable about how to do it. You tell me its fine 3 paragraphs up. then
> > tell me lvcreate will wipe it out.  I'm asking for answers, not more
> > connumdrums..
> 
> You've split your reply to my mail across three different emails and
> now you're replying to a part about redundancy, but asking questions
> about something completely different, all while referring to bits
> that are not proximal to where your text is, so it's unclear to me
> exactly what you are asking about.
> 
> You asked if "labels" would survive their associated partition being
> put into LVM.
> 
> I said, "yes if you mean partition names, no if you mean filesystem
> labels".
> 
> To my implied question about your redundancy plans (if any), you
> then complain that I have not given you "a syllable about how to do
> it". Do *what*? I don't yet know what your plans are in that regard.
> If you have questions, ask them.

I think the paste in
  https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2024/02/msg00611.html
shows that SiPwr_1 is a filesystem LABEL, not a PARTLABEL,
lying as it does between an FSVER and a UUID.

Cheers,
David.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-14 23:10 +0100
  Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 01:50 +0100
    Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 03:10 +0100
      Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-15 03:30 +0100
      Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 17:00 +0100
    Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-15 03:20 +0100
    Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2024-02-15 03:20 +0100
      Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 04:10 +0100
    Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 04:00 +0100
      Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 17:20 +0100
        Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-15 17:30 +0100
        Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 21:30 +0100
          Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 21:50 +0100
            Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-15 22:30 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 07:40 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-16 15:50 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-17 03:20 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-17 06:50 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 07:40 +0100
                Of irrelevant chatter and meta-chatter [was: f3tools vs Silicon  Power 4T drive] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-17 09:50 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-17 18:50 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-18 02:30 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-16 21:10 +0100
            Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 22:50 +0100
            Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 02:50 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-02-16 13:50 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 16:40 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-16 16:00 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 21:20 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2024-02-16 21:50 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 22:10 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 22:20 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-02-17 21:20 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-17 03:30 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-17 06:40 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-17 06:40 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-18 02:10 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-02-18 07:50 +0100
          Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 21:00 +0100
    Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 17:10 +0100
      Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-02-15 18:40 +0100
        Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 20:50 +0100
          Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-15 22:10 +0100
            Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-15 22:30 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive gene heskett <gheskett@shentel.net> - 2024-02-16 07:20 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net> - 2024-02-16 15:40 +0100
                Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 21:30 +0100
            Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2024-02-15 23:40 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-02-16 08:50 +0100
            Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Christensen <dpchrist@holgerdanske.com> - 2024-02-16 21:10 +0100
              Re: f3tools vs Silicon Power 4T drive David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2024-02-16 21:10 +0100

csiph-web