Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #262117
| From | Valerio Vanni <valerio.vanni@inwind.it> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot |
| Date | 2023-10-03 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <HkKFr-devd-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HiLFE-c08q-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <HkD1f-d9Qz-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
Il 03/10/2023 04:01, Jeffrey Walton ha scritto: >>> Does it mean that you can not boot your *old* Clonezilla live after booting a latest Clonezilla? If so, it is better to discuss the issue with shim or grub developers. >> >> Yes. If I load a Clonezilla live newer than 3.1.0-11, then I cannot boot >> anymore 2.8.1-12. > > I would probably bet if you booted to Windows, the OS would check the > Forbidden Signature/Secure Boot DBX and (re)apply KB5012170 [0] as > required. No, it hasn't happen. If you read entire discussion, it hasn't happen nieither with Windows 10 nor Windows 11. The only action that breaks secure boot of Clonezilla 2.8.1-12 is reaching the page of Grub entries in recent Clonezilla and Debian live. > So you are probably going to have to deal with this sooner rather than > later. Both OSes are going to try to update the database with > signatures of the bad grub programs. Or I would not bet against it. > > Jeff > > [0] https://support.microsoft.com/en-gb/topic/kb5012170-security-update-for-secure-boot-dbx-72ff5eed-25b4-47c7-be28-c42bd211bb15 Yes, no one can tell... but this update has more than six months. So far it seems that Linux has a larger revocation database. And, even if Windows would adobt this larger database, I keep on considering it bad in a live environment. Be it Live Windows or Live Linux.
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Valerio Vanni <valerio.vanni@inwind.it> - 2023-09-28 01:00 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-09-28 05:10 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-09-28 16:20 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-09-29 12:00 +0200
On the uses of secure boot [was: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-09-29 12:20 +0200
Re: On the uses of secure boot [was: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot] Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 12:30 +0200
Re: On the uses of secure boot [was: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot] Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2023-09-29 18:50 +0200
Re: On the uses of secure boot [was: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-09-30 09:30 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-09-29 13:00 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-10-03 04:10 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Valerio Vanni <valerio.vanni@inwind.it> - 2023-10-03 12:20 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-10-04 19:20 +0200
csiph-web