Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.user > #261971
| From | <tomas@tuxteam.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.user |
| Subject | On the uses of secure boot [was: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot] |
| Date | 2023-09-29 12:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <HjiLf-ckSR-1@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <HiLFE-c08q-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <HiPzz-c2IM-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HjirT-ckwL-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 10:50:37AM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > Stefan wrote: > >> With outdated keys secure boot does not protect you. > > > >Just to clarify: in 99.99% of the cases, SecureBoot does not protect you > >(and is not designed to protect you either). > > Sigh. Lose the misinformation crap, please. It's getting tedious. He-said-she-said. JFTR. I don't know about the exact number, but I tend to agree with Stefan here. But since we aren't exchanging arguments but just ready made conclusions, the discussion doesn't lead anywhere. One thing we can agree, though, may be that secure boot gives more control of the platform to the hardware maker (who, after all is the one choosing the TPM and the firmware going in and around there). Whether the hardware maker is your ally, Microsoft's ally or Google's ally (or Netflix or who-the-devil-knows) is another long and winding discussion. I tend to think that Microsoft is higher up that list than you & me. Cheers -- t
Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Valerio Vanni <valerio.vanni@inwind.it> - 2023-09-28 01:00 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-09-28 05:10 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2023-09-28 16:20 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-09-29 12:00 +0200
On the uses of secure boot [was: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-09-29 12:20 +0200
Re: On the uses of secure boot [was: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot] Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-09-29 12:30 +0200
Re: On the uses of secure boot [was: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot] Curt <curty@free.fr> - 2023-09-29 18:50 +0200
Re: On the uses of secure boot [was: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-09-30 09:30 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Steve McIntyre <steve@einval.com> - 2023-09-29 13:00 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-10-03 04:10 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Valerio Vanni <valerio.vanni@inwind.it> - 2023-10-03 12:20 +0200
Re: Debian live boot corrupting secure boot Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-10-04 19:20 +0200
csiph-web