Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #265498

Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?

From <tomas@tuxteam.de>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
Date 2024-01-04 12:00 +0100
Message-ID <HStC9-HX1-15@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <HSgOB-Ak1-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <HShhD-Ati-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <HShKF-ATc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <HSix3-Brn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HSiGJ-BuJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 07:13:01AM +0800, Bret Busby wrote:

[...]

> Then "fail" seems to be the appropriate word.

[...]

> If all else fails, read the words in front of you.

Folks, please, no need to be snarky.

Everyone of us overlooks something at times; something obvious to
someone may escape someone else and vice versa [0].

In this case it's honestly difficult to thoroughly understand those
marketing monikers which encompas a thicket of encryption primitives,
key lengths, key exchange protocols, key management strategies, authen
protocols and the whole sh*t pie up to the top.

I don't, and I admit it.

Here's one link to the source (which I found in Debian's package page
which seems to suggest that they actually "do" WPA3 [1]. The next step
would be to find out what "to do WPA3" actually means, since there
will be probably lots of things which are optional and both parties
have to negotiate, and there's possibly a policy part where one party
can say "ah, no, if you can't do thingmajig-2 with at least 193 bits
I'm out" or something.

The next step would be to contact their mailing list and ask.

Cheers

[0] And yes, please, remind me if I fail this standard,
   which I'm sure I do at times.

[1] https://w1.fi/wpa_supplicant/

-- 
t

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-03 18:40 +0100
  Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-01-03 22:20 +0100
    Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-03 22:50 +0100
      Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-01-03 23:20 +0100
        Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:10 +0100
          Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-01-04 00:20 +0100
            Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:30 +0100
              Name calling? [WAS: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't  support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?] "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2024-01-04 00:50 +0100
            Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-01-04 12:00 +0100
          Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-01-04 00:20 +0100
            Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-01-04 14:00 +0100
        Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-01-04 00:10 +0100
          Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:20 +0100
      Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-01-04 00:00 +0100
        Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-01-04 00:20 +0100
          Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:30 +0100
            Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal   authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Charles Kroeger <mbone@gmx.co.uk> - 2024-01-12 08:40 +0100
              Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2024-01-12 14:20 +0100
        Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Pocket <pocket@columbus.rr.com> - 2024-01-04 00:20 +0100
          Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-01-04 00:30 +0100
            Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:40 +0100
          Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:30 +0100
        Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:20 +0100
      Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2024-01-04 00:50 +0100
      Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2024-01-04 01:00 +0100
        Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-01-04 01:20 +0100
  Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2024-01-04 01:30 +0100

csiph-web