Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.user > #265474

Name calling? [WAS: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?]

From "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com>
Newsgroups linux.debian.user
Subject Name calling? [WAS: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?]
Date 2024-01-04 00:50 +0100
Message-ID <HSj9L-BEa-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <HShhD-Ati-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <HShKF-ATc-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <HSix3-Brn-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <HSiGJ-BuJ-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <HSiQp-BxU-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Jan 04, 2024 at 12:28:56AM +0100, Stella Ashburne wrote:
> 
> 
> > Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2024 at 7:13 AM
> > From: "Bret Busby" <bret@busby.net>
> > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?
> >
<snip>
> >
> And you fail to see that the sub-heading contradicts the contents of the package's description.
> 
> >  From the text that I quoted from that web page,
> >
> > "wpa-supplicant is a userspace daemon handling connection and
> > authentication in wireless and wired networks, primarily secured with
> > the WPA/WPA2/WPA3 protocols"
> >
> > If all else fails, read the words in front of you.
> 
> Being at least three decades younger than you, my eye sight is far superior to yours. You most probably are suffering from presbyopia but that's OK because it's normal for senior citizens.
> 
> 
> 

Possibly being older than you, Stella - and wearing varifocals now - there's
still no good justification for being sarcastic about folk who are trying 
to be helpful on this list.

Was it really only _yesterday_ that I posted a refactored FAQ document
asking people to be constructive and considerate? 

My old man's sense of time must be defective (I'll be 62 in a couple of
weeks and I've only worn corrective vision glasses for the last 58 years)
> 

Please don't jump to conclusions about people's physical or mental
capabilities unless it's germane - it's unhelpful and doesn't contribute
either helpfully or meaningfully to discussion.

All the very best, as ever,

Andy
(amacater@debian.org)
> 

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-03 18:40 +0100
  Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Anssi Saari <anssi.saari@debian-user.mail.kapsi.fi> - 2024-01-03 22:20 +0100
    Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-03 22:50 +0100
      Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-01-03 23:20 +0100
        Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:10 +0100
          Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-01-04 00:20 +0100
            Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:30 +0100
              Name calling? [WAS: Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't  support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist?] "Andrew M.A. Cater" <amacater@einval.com> - 2024-01-04 00:50 +0100
            Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2024-01-04 12:00 +0100
          Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2024-01-04 00:20 +0100
            Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? debian-user@howorth.org.uk - 2024-01-04 14:00 +0100
        Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-01-04 00:10 +0100
          Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:20 +0100
      Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-01-04 00:00 +0100
        Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-01-04 00:20 +0100
          Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:30 +0100
            Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal   authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Charles Kroeger <mbone@gmx.co.uk> - 2024-01-12 08:40 +0100
              Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Henning Follmann <hfollmann@itcfollmann.com> - 2024-01-12 14:20 +0100
        Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Pocket <pocket@columbus.rr.com> - 2024-01-04 00:20 +0100
          Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2024-01-04 00:30 +0100
            Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:40 +0100
          Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:30 +0100
        Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stella Ashburne <rewefie@gmx.com> - 2024-01-04 00:20 +0100
      Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2024-01-04 00:50 +0100
      Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> - 2024-01-04 01:00 +0100
        Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2024-01-04 01:20 +0100
  Re: The current package wpasupplicant doesn't support WPA3-Personal  authentication. What alternatives to it exist? Kushal Kumaran <kushal@locationd.net> - 2024-01-04 01:30 +0100

csiph-web