Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #263695

Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail

Show all headers | View raw

pardon the top posting.
I made a minor change to the security settings that Webmasters omitted 
(or said Not to do) in their documentation for the security upgrades on 
their servers, and it's working again. a couple thousand messages to 
clean and sort, but my will filters do 97% of that.
  I will message their support and help them correct their error.
thanks for listening.
Peter Ehlert

On 11/18/23 09:06, peter ehlert wrote:
> damn! I forgot... not able to receive on my POP mail accounts!
> now using the hateful Gmail...
> maybe that's why Thunderbird can't use a mailing list, they don't trust 
> their own email app. Eff Them!
> 
> On 11/18/23 08:58, Peter Ehlert wrote:
>> thread back from the dead:
>> first, thanks for all of the input and wise suggestions
>>
>> I am going crazy with Thunderbird, and Claws too.
>> Now Claws has a calendar add-on, did not try it but maybe it will 
>> suffice.
>>
>> My longtime web and email host support have been struggling to help 
>> me, Kudos to webmasters dot com
>>
>> IMP vs POP ...the "web" seems to reverse the definitions! I don't know 
>> who to trust
>>
>> I really want to keep messages on their server, space is Not an issue.
>>
>> Question: with IMAP is it feasible for a mail client to Leave messages 
>> on the server?
>>
>> On 8/15/23 09:43, Peter Ehlert wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I am a long time user of Thunderbird. No real complaints, but the GUI 
>>> has been slowly been changed.
>>> lately I have been struggling with that, trying to get it to be My 
>>> Way. Minor success.
>>>
>>> also the .msf files have gotten Huge and that hinders rapid and easy 
>>> backups.
>>>
>>> In the process I would like to do some housekeeping, fix a few 
>>> filters and rearrange my copious folders.
>>>
>>> Question: do you folks recommend migrating to Claws Mail?
>>> the initial look and feel seems to be familiar and comfortable, but I 
>>> know little of the history and stability.
>>>
>>> secondly, will I be missing the basic features such as Filters?
>>>
>>> thanks in advance.
>>>

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-08-15 19:10 +0200
  Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Marco <mo01@posteo.de> - 2023-08-15 19:20 +0200
  Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-08-15 20:40 +0200
  Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2023-08-15 21:20 +0200
    Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail "Russell L. Harris" <russell@rlharris.org> - 2023-08-15 21:50 +0200
      Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2023-08-15 23:30 +0200
      Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Frank Lanitz <frank@frank.uvena.de> - 2023-08-29 20:30 +0200
    Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-08-19 16:10 +0200
      Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Bret Busby <bret@busby.net> - 2023-08-19 16:30 +0200
  Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Max Nikulin <manikulin@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 04:30 +0200
    Re: Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <peter@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-08-19 16:20 +0200
  Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-11-18 18:10 +0100
    Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail peter ehlert <sdibaja@gmail.com> - 2023-11-18 18:30 +0100
      Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail peter ehlert <sdibaja@gmail.com> - 2023-11-19 16:00 +0100
    Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Alex <alex@blueselene.com> - 2023-11-18 19:10 +0100
      Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail jeremy ardley <jeremy.ardley@gmail.com> - 2023-11-19 01:10 +0100
        Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail jeremy ardley <jeremy.ardley@gmail.com> - 2023-11-19 02:30 +0100
    Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-11-18 20:30 +0100
      Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-11-18 22:30 +0100
        Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-11-19 13:10 +0100
      Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Tim Woodall <debianuser@woodall.me.uk> - 2023-11-19 05:40 +0100
        Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-11-19 06:50 +0100
      Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-11-19 13:00 +0100
        Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Joe <joe@jretrading.com> - 2023-11-19 17:20 +0100
    Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-11-19 17:00 +0100
      Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail Tixy <tixy@yxit.co.uk> - 2023-11-19 19:00 +0100
    Re: IMAP vs POP was Thunderbird vs Claws Mail David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-11-21 04:50 +0100

csiph-web