Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #258038

Re: relevance of packages in repositories

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/7/23, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 7:30 AM Дмитрий wrote:
>>
>> the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and
>> in order to get the current version, you need to drag something like
>> Homebrew, it really pisses you off and pushes you away from using the
>> distribution
>
> You might give Fedora a try. Its release cadence is every 6 months. At
> each release, Fedora typically supplies the most current version of a
> package.
>
> You may find Fedora aligns better with your requirements.

How about Arch linux?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arch_Linux
  Arch Linux is an independently developed, x86-64 general-purpose
Linux distribution that strives to provide the latest stable versions
of most software by following a rolling-release model.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: relevance of packages in repositories Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-05-07 17:50 +0200
  Re: relevance of packages in repositories Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2023-05-07 21:00 +0200
    Re: relevance of packages in repositories Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-07 21:20 +0200
      Re: relevance of packages in repositories Michel Verdier <mv524@free.fr> - 2023-05-07 21:40 +0200
        Re: relevance of packages in repositories Oliver Schoede <oliver.schode@online.de> - 2023-05-08 07:20 +0200
      Re: relevance of packages in repositories Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-05-08 20:00 +0200
        Re: relevance of packages in repositories John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2023-05-08 21:10 +0200

csiph-web