Re: relevance of packages in repositories

From	Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: relevance of packages in repositories
Date	2023-05-07 17:50 +0200
Message-ID	<GsOO5-7gpd-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	<GsLnb-7eym-17@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

On Sun, May 7, 2023 at 7:30 AM Дмитрий <demonik_82@mail.ru> wrote:
>
> the stable version of Neodim 9.0 in debian 12 is the SEVENTH version, and in order to get the current version, you need to drag something like Homebrew, it really pisses you off and pushes you away from using the distribution

You might give Fedora a try. Its release cadence is every 6 months. At
each release, Fedora typically supplies the most current version of a
package.

You may find Fedora aligns better with your requirements.

Jeff

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: relevance of packages in repositories Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-05-07 17:50 +0200
  Re: relevance of packages in repositories Lee <ler762@gmail.com> - 2023-05-07 21:00 +0200
    Re: relevance of packages in repositories Brian <ad44@cityscape.co.uk> - 2023-05-07 21:20 +0200
      Re: relevance of packages in repositories Michel Verdier <mv524@free.fr> - 2023-05-07 21:40 +0200
        Re: relevance of packages in repositories Oliver Schoede <oliver.schode@online.de> - 2023-05-08 07:20 +0200
      Re: relevance of packages in repositories Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-05-08 20:00 +0200
        Re: relevance of packages in repositories John Hasler <john@sugarbit.com> - 2023-05-08 21:10 +0200

csiph-web