Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #257557

Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable?]

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 09:27:03AM +0800, hl wrote:
> 
> On 4/25/23 07:39, Greg Wooledge wrote:

[...]

> > Please do not put important details exclusively in the Subject: header
> > of your email [...]

> i've thought it's redundant to repeat it in mail body, it's waste of
> reader's time

For some, yes. For others, no. I think this is one of the most
difficult (and interesting) things in a huge and diverse mailing
list like this: there are people with extremely different ways
of living and backgrounds.

One has to be humble and, from time to time learn that other
people's inner workings are totally different.

But this is exciting, too :-)

Cheers
-- 
t

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-04-25 01:50 +0200
  Re: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable? Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-04-25 03:00 +0200
    Re: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable? songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2023-04-25 14:50 +0200
  Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-04-25 06:40 +0200
    Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-04-25 08:50 +0200
    Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] dmacdoug <dmacdoug@usc.edu> - 2023-04-25 10:00 +0200
      Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-04-25 12:50 +0200
        Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-04-25 16:10 +0200
      Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-04-25 13:10 +0200
        Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Christoph Brinkhaus <c.brinkhaus@t-online.de> - 2023-04-25 15:20 +0200
          Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-04-25 16:00 +0200
          Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-04-25 16:50 +0200
      Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 16:00 +0200
    Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-04-25 15:40 +0200

csiph-web