Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable?]

From	Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org>
Newsgroups	linux.debian.user
Subject	Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable?]
Date	2023-04-25 12:50 +0200
Message-ID	<Goopb-4p0h-5@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References	(2 earlier) <GoiD7-4l8j-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <GoiD7-4l8j-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <GokEV-4mw9-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <GolKF-4nep-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <Goopb-4p0h-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization	linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw

hl wrote: 
> why not use mail reader with gui, (e.g. Thunderbird)? gui allows you to get
> info easily. you don't have to remember lots of things, just a few clicks,
> you can get info you need.

We have users who are blind.

We have users who are using low-bandwidth connections.

We have users who are using tiny-screened devices.

We have users using devices with only text capabilities.

We have users who like using mutt and other text MUAs.

-dsr-

Thread

Re: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-04-25 01:50 +0200
  Re: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable? Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-04-25 03:00 +0200
    Re: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable? songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2023-04-25 14:50 +0200
  Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-04-25 06:40 +0200
    Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-04-25 08:50 +0200
    Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] dmacdoug <dmacdoug@usc.edu> - 2023-04-25 10:00 +0200
      Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-04-25 12:50 +0200
        Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-04-25 16:10 +0200
      Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-04-25 13:10 +0200
        Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Christoph Brinkhaus <c.brinkhaus@t-online.de> - 2023-04-25 15:20 +0200
          Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-04-25 16:00 +0200
          Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-04-25 16:50 +0200
      Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 16:00 +0200
    Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-04-25 15:40 +0200

csiph-web