Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.debian.user > #257556

Re: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable?

Show all headers | View raw

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw

On April 24, 2023 4:39:47 PM Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 05:52:55AM +0800, hl wrote:
>> i always use stable, Thanks!
>
> You're welcome!
>
> And that was the entire body of your email, so that's all you had to
> say, yes?
>
> ...
>
> Please do not put important details exclusively in the Subject: header
> of your email.  The purpose of a Subject: header is to allow people to
> find your messages in the list archives later on, if they have a similar
> problem and want to find past solutions.
Now that you have been properly scolded.
...
Weekend of June 10

>
> Your question appears to be "What's the timeline for bookworm's release?"
>
> We have the following resources:
>
> * https://wiki.debian.org/DebianBookworm
> * https://release.debian.org/bookworm/freeze_policy.html
>
> Both of these pages tell us that the final freeze date is not yet
> determined.

Back to linux.debian.user | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable? Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-04-25 01:50 +0200
  Re: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable? Peter Ehlert <pb21a@sdi-baja.com> - 2023-04-25 03:00 +0200
    Re: is it imminent that bookworm becomes stable? songbird <songbird@anthive.com> - 2023-04-25 14:50 +0200
  Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-04-25 06:40 +0200
    Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] <tomas@tuxteam.de> - 2023-04-25 08:50 +0200
    Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] dmacdoug <dmacdoug@usc.edu> - 2023-04-25 10:00 +0200
      Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-04-25 12:50 +0200
        Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org> - 2023-04-25 16:10 +0200
      Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-04-25 13:10 +0200
        Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Christoph Brinkhaus <c.brinkhaus@t-online.de> - 2023-04-25 15:20 +0200
          Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org> - 2023-04-25 16:00 +0200
          Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] David Wright <deblis@lionunicorn.co.uk> - 2023-04-25 16:50 +0200
      Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> - 2023-04-25 16:00 +0200
    Re: Putting important stuff exclusively in the subject [was: is it  imminent that bookworm becomes stable?] Charles Curley <charlescurley@charlescurley.com> - 2023-04-25 15:40 +0200

csiph-web