Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1122948

Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error

From Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.dist
Subject Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error
Date 2022-10-30 12:00 +0100
Message-ID <FmecN-8JX-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <FlZx7-hAyv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EGC53-9Mmo-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fmd74-83F-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <EGC53-9Mmo-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <Fmd74-83F-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


Axel Beckert:
> Hi,
> 
>> I am looking at making `debian/foo` an error by default in debhelper compat
>> 15 (triggering a warning from compat 14).
> 
> Uargh, yet another bad decision which makes one want to no more using
> debhelper. :-(
> 

Hi Axel,

I understand that you are unsatisfied with this proposal and that is 
fair. Though from my point of view, your email makes it hard for me to 
want to engage with you to find a solution that would (ideally) satisfy 
your desires as well as solve the underlying problem that Steve wants to 
have solved.

Notably, nowhere in your email can I see any attempt from you to say 
"Could we find an alternative where single binary source packages can 
still leverage this short cut, because I find it very valuable?" in a 
neutral or constructive manner.

Instead, it feels to me like you are dumping your frustration on me and 
have given up on working with me in solving the problem in the best way 
for all parties (including you!).
    I find emails like this super draining on my motivation. I have no 
interest in spending my volunteer time working with people that writing 
emails phrased such that they make me feel like that person has given up 
on me.


I ask that you rephrase your email in a way where I do not feel you have 
given up on working with me, if you want me to engage any further with 
you. I hope we can agree on that minimum baseline for future communication.


~Niels

Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2022-10-29 21:20 +0200
  Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> - 2022-10-30 10:50 +0100
    Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2022-10-30 12:00 +0100
      Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> - 2022-10-30 18:00 +0100
        Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2022-11-05 13:00 +0100
  Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2022-10-31 16:20 +0100

csiph-web