Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.bugs.dist > #1122936
| From | Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.bugs.dist |
| Subject | Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error |
| Date | 2022-10-30 10:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <Fmd74-83F-9@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <EH4um-a4t8-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <EGC53-9Mmo-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <FlZx7-hAyv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <EGC53-9Mmo-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <FlZx7-hAyv-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | The Debian Project |
Hi,
> I am looking at making `debian/foo` an error by default in debhelper compat
> 15 (triggering a warning from compat 14).
Uargh, yet another bad decision which makes one want to no more using
debhelper. :-(
> > > This kind of packaging, with some packaging files under debian/ having an
> > > associated binary package name and some not, is an antipattern.
> >
> > +1
-1
> > (I also don't like packaging files without binary package name for
> > single-binary source package, but that's just a matter of taste.)
Exactly. I find it a very annoying nuisance to have to do that for
single binary packages.
> These have historically applied to all packages and it does not seem useful
> to force everyone to maintain N copies of {changelog,copyright,...}.
It also would probably violate the policy with regards to source packages.
> I have CC'ed lintian + lintian-brush on CC and cloned bugs for them. Having
> a lintian tag for them will enable the Janitor to help with the migration,
> so I agree we should have a lintian tag for this.
*sigh*
Regards, Axel
--
,''`. | Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org>, https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
`- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
Back to linux.debian.bugs.dist | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2022-10-29 21:20 +0200
Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> - 2022-10-30 10:50 +0100
Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2022-10-30 12:00 +0100
Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error Axel Beckert <abe@debian.org> - 2022-10-30 18:00 +0100
Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> - 2022-11-05 13:00 +0100
Bug#1014537: unnamed packaging files in a multibinary package should be an error Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> - 2022-10-31 16:20 +0100
csiph-web