Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.debian.bugs.rc > #338323

Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm

From Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name>
Newsgroups linux.debian.bugs.rc
Subject Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm
Date 2023-02-06 12:40 +0100
Message-ID <FW7o7-3TsJ-23@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink)
References <FVNIJ-3DbJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it> <FVu3n-3q2E-3@gated-at.bofh.it> <FVNIJ-3DbJ-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Organization linux.* mail to news gateway

Show all headers | View raw


On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 01:50:34PM +0000, Julian Gilbey wrote:
> Our social contract #4 says "Our priorities are our users and free
> software".  What benefits would having the python3.10 base packages in
> bookworm bring for our users (as I point out, for some users, this is
> a necessity) and what disadvantages would it bring (none that I can
> think of)?  Why would we tell a whole bunch of our users: "Don't
> upgrade to Debian 12 until all of the critical packages you use from
> PyPI are upgraded to support Python 3.11, or fix those packages
> yourself"?
The next obvious step for these use cases is to just install 3.10 with
pyenv.

Back to linux.debian.bugs.rc | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@wrar.name> - 2023-02-06 12:40 +0100
  Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> - 2023-02-06 21:40 +0100
    Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb+debian@uvt.nl> - 2023-02-07 12:50 +0100
      Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm Stefano Rivera <stefanor@debian.org> - 2023-02-07 15:30 +0100
        Bug#1030530: Python 3.10 in bookworm karthek <frustrated@karthek.com> - 2023-02-07 18:30 +0100
          Bug#1030530: pyenv / Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm Joost van Baal-Ilić <joostvb+debian@uvt.nl> - 2023-02-08 09:10 +0100

csiph-web