Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.debian.maint.python > #14893
| From | Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | linux.debian.maint.python |
| Subject | Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm |
| Date | 2023-02-05 20:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <FVT1L-3GBi-7@gated-at.bofh.it> (permalink) |
| References | <FVKBb-3BgI-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <FVOv7-3DJv-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <FVQZX-3Fmr-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| Organization | linux.* mail to news gateway |
On February 5, 2023 5:22:33 PM UTC, Julian Gilbey <julian@d-and-j.net> wrote: >On Sun, Feb 05, 2023 at 02:41:08PM +0000, Stefano Rivera wrote: >> Hi Julian (2023.02.05_10:38:23_+0000) >> >> > Why is the current intention not to ship the python3.10 package in >> > bookworm? >> >> Because we aim to have a single Python release supported in every stable >> release. > >I am not suggesting that we revert to having Python 3.10 as a >"supported version" (that would be a whole separate discussion); I am >suggesting that we keep just the Python 3.10 interpreter and >python3.10-venv in bookworm, so that users can use it to run a virtual >environment if they need to do so. That would narrow the impact, but it's not free either. The interpreter packages often need post-release support from the maintainer and the security team. Someone would also have to triage all the bug reports associated with Debian user expectations for a Python version in Debian not being met. Scott K
Back to linux.debian.maint.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python 3.10 in bookworm Scott Kitterman <debian@kitterman.com> - 2023-02-05 20:40 +0100
csiph-web